2022
DOI: 10.1111/all.15305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine based on folded receptor binding domain‐PreS fusion protein with potential to induce sterilizing immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2 variants

Abstract: Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is responsible for the ongoing global COVID‐19 pandemic. One possibility to control the pandemic is to induce sterilizing immunity through the induction and maintenance of neutralizing antibodies preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 from entering human cells to replicate in. Methods We report the construction and in vitro and in vivo characterization of a SARS‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 53 While COVID‐19 convalescent individuals generally showed negligible levels of IgG 4 antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 S‐ or RBD‐proteins, 26 low levels of IgG 4 anti S‐ and anti RBD‐antibodies could be detected in a subset of individuals vaccinated with mRNA SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. 61 , 62 The slow but sustained build‐up of IgG 4 levels is typical for this immunoglobulin isotype, 63 as also observed in allergen‐specific immunotherapy trials 64 in which IgG 4 increased only after a series of 5–7 injections with antigen over a prolonged period of time (1–2 years). This may explain why IgG 4 build‐up is rather slow, even if T cells elaborate its switch factor, IL‐13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“… 53 While COVID‐19 convalescent individuals generally showed negligible levels of IgG 4 antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 S‐ or RBD‐proteins, 26 low levels of IgG 4 anti S‐ and anti RBD‐antibodies could be detected in a subset of individuals vaccinated with mRNA SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. 61 , 62 The slow but sustained build‐up of IgG 4 levels is typical for this immunoglobulin isotype, 63 as also observed in allergen‐specific immunotherapy trials 64 in which IgG 4 increased only after a series of 5–7 injections with antigen over a prolonged period of time (1–2 years). This may explain why IgG 4 build‐up is rather slow, even if T cells elaborate its switch factor, IL‐13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Interim results from a phase I/II trial of an RBD-human IgG1 Fc vaccine (ancestral strain) with montenide oil-in-water adjuvant in a two-dose prime-boost schedule provided evidence of strong neutralising antibody responses with low levels of reactogenicity 41 . Another approach used to develop an RBD-based vaccine was to fuse two RBDs to a hepatitis B surface antigen (PreS) plus Alum, which generated robust responses in rabbits and in a single human volunteer 53 . Others have developed RBD monomeric vaccines with Alum or Alum-based adjuvants also administered as three-dose schedules 37, 54 one of which is in human clinical trials 54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBD protein vaccines are in various stages of development and testing(https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines) 8,37,40,41,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] , and one, ZF2001 8,50 , is now approved for emergency use in several countries, including China, Uzbekistan, Indonesia and Columbia (https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/27/). This is a dimeric RBD vaccine where two RBD subunits are linked via an engineered single-chain construct and administered with Alum adjuvant as a three-dose schedule 8 .…”
Section: Severalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-Cell ELISA was then developed using DY999 substrate solution according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN USA) and measured at 450 nm (and at 630 nm to assess the background) using a Mithras multimode plate reader (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). To calculate percent inhibition of infection in each well, the following formula was used: 100 – [(X - average of ‘no virus’ wells)/(average of ‘virus only’ wells - average of ‘no virus’wells)*100], where X is the background-subtracted read for each well, as we did previously ( 50 , 51 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%