2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45024-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine Analysis: Strategies, Principles, and Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 427 publications
(547 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formaldehyde inactivation continues to be used more extensively in vaccines today. Poliovirus (PV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), tick borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), rabies virus, and influenza virus each have licensed inactivated vaccines produced from formaldehyde inactivated particles (Sanders et al, 2015). Vaccines for viruses inactivated with UV irradiation have been proven to be effective in producing virus-specific immune responses for murine leukemia virus strain Cas-Br-M (UV-Cas) (Sarzotti et al, 1994) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) (Vanhee et al, 2009), but this was not the case with the UV-inactivated vaccine for rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) (Henning et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formaldehyde inactivation continues to be used more extensively in vaccines today. Poliovirus (PV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), tick borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), rabies virus, and influenza virus each have licensed inactivated vaccines produced from formaldehyde inactivated particles (Sanders et al, 2015). Vaccines for viruses inactivated with UV irradiation have been proven to be effective in producing virus-specific immune responses for murine leukemia virus strain Cas-Br-M (UV-Cas) (Sarzotti et al, 1994) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) (Vanhee et al, 2009), but this was not the case with the UV-inactivated vaccine for rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) (Henning et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zoster vaccine is a new, adjuvanted, non-live recombinant shingles vaccine, without the capacity to produce the disease, making it less reactogenic [2]. Thus, a weaker immune response is created, and a subsequent booster injection is typically required to establish immunogenicity [3,4]. Contraindications for the vaccine include a history of severe allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any vaccine or vaccine component, current shingles infection, and pregnancy [1,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if a downstream release method were to be updated to be more precise, this would allow room for greater variability in the upstream product manufacture process while still resulting in the same total (process + analytical) variability. Since this update in the testing method could lead to an unacceptable product change, analytical changes will require a holistic view and approach. , In addition, the release methods are also deployed globally as regulatory agencies in many countries carry out their own release testing upon importation of vaccines. Therefore, these methods should meet a set of stringent requirements, including affordability, robustness, and simplicity with respect to equipment, operational procedures, and requirement of trained personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%