2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02270.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccination with β2‐Microglobulin‐Deficient Dendritic Cells Protects Against Growth of β2‐Microglobulin‐Deficient Tumours

Abstract: Defects in cell surface expression of major histocompatibility complex class I antigen molecules are common in tumour cells. We have previously described the generation of adaptive immunity to tumour cells deficient in the transporter associated with antigen processing molecule. In this study, we demonstrate enhanced in vivo protection against growth of β2‐microglobulin‐deficient tumour cells in syngeneic C57Bl/6 mice, following vaccination with β2‐microglobulin‐deficient dendritic cells. In vitro analysis sug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals were humanely sacrificed and the vital organs (kidney, lungs, heart, liver, spleen and intestines) isolated, weighed and examined for macroscopic changes and/or development of any lesions [11], then stored in 40% formalin. Features of both treated and control groups were compared and then histologically evaluated by the Department of Pathology -MUHAS.…”
Section: Histopathological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Animals were humanely sacrificed and the vital organs (kidney, lungs, heart, liver, spleen and intestines) isolated, weighed and examined for macroscopic changes and/or development of any lesions [11], then stored in 40% formalin. Features of both treated and control groups were compared and then histologically evaluated by the Department of Pathology -MUHAS.…”
Section: Histopathological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological evaluation and photomicrography was performed by the Histopathologist using an Olympus (CX31RBSF Model) light microscope equipped with a digital camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Tissue toxicity (damage) was evaluated under the microscope on 7 lowpower fields (x10 magnification) as well as on their high-power fields (x40 magnification) while taking pictures [11,12]. Picture processing and printing was performed using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA).…”
Section: Histopathological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%