. After antigen uptake and activation, DCs mature and migrate to lymphoid tissues, where they present antigen-derived peptides on major histocompatibility complex type II (MHC-II) molecules and provide stimulatory signals for antigen-specific T cells. Because of the important role of DCs in the induction of protective immunity, DC targeting of antigens has been a much-pursued strategy in the development of genetic and protein-based vaccines. For this, vaccine antigens were fused to antibodies or ligands of DC surface molecules and delivered directly as a protein vaccine or through encoding DNA in a genetic plasmid-or viral vectorbased vaccine regimen (4,33,37,43,44). A different approach is the coexpression of chemoattractant molecules by a genetic vaccine to recruit APCs to the site of vaccine delivery. This approach has been studied in immunotherapy of tumors (16,19,34,46) and also for vaccination against virus infections (5, 13, 26, 47), but it has not yet been tested in a retrovirus challenge model.In this vaccination study we sought to increase the presence of DCs at the site of vaccine delivery. For this, we coadministered adenovirus vectors encoding different chemokines along with viral antigens. Chemokines are a group of proinflammatory proteins of 6 to 14 kDa that act as ligands of G-protein-coupled receptors (reviewed in reference 31) expressed on leukocytes. Chemokines induce the migration of these cells and play an important role in both homeostasis and inflammation. For these different processes, some chemokines are expressed continuously in certain tissues, while others are only expressed in response to inflammatory stimuli. Depending on the expression of their respective receptors, chemokines can stimulate multiple cell types. In the present study we studied the effects of the chemokines CCL3, CCL20, CCL21, and CXCL14 on immune responses induced by an adenovirus-based vaccine. All four tested chemokines, while acting on differing ranges of target cells, are known to be chemoattractants for DCs (reviewed in reference 48).We analyzed the adjuvant effect of chemokines for retroviral immunity using an HIV vaccination mouse model and the Friend retrovirus (FV) model. FV is an immunosuppressive retroviral complex, consisting of the apathogenic Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV) and the replication-defective but pathogenic spleen focus-forming virus, that causes splenomegaly and lethal erythroleukemia in susceptible mice (15). In contrast to the vaccination against HIV proteins, the FV model allows for challenging immunized mice with a pathogenic retrovirus. The FV infection model has offered valuable insights into the role of particular cell types in the immune response to a retroviral infection and into the basic requirements for immune protection. Using attenuated F-MuLV helper virus, it was demonstrated that complete protection from lethal FV challenge requires both humoral and cellular responses, comprising antibodies and CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells (10). Although the correlates of immune protection ...