2020
DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a5543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccination rates for Syrian population under temporary protection in Turkey

Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this study was to gather information on demographic and health indicators, primarily vaccination status, of Syrians under temporary protection in five provinces of Turkey and to develop infrastructure for vaccination planning. Methods: The population under study consists of 89,986 Syrian children, 0-4 years of age, residing in Ankara, Mersin, Gaziantep, Izmir, and Bursa. Initially, we planned to evaluate 2,339 children, although a total of 2,827 children were evaluated by the end of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rotavirus vaccine was reported for only children, and low coverage was found in traveller communities (47.6%) and reduced uptake with subsequent dosage in disadvantaged areas (most deprived: first dose, 90.6%; second dose, 84.9%) [ 100 ]. Protection against shingles and varicella infections among migrants was high, for instance, seroprotection in Syrian migrants in Turkey (91.4%) and asylum seekers in The Netherlands (96%), but coverage by deprivation regions in the UK was lower (most deprived, 54.1%; least deprived, 64.1%) [ 23 , 44 , 101 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rotavirus vaccine was reported for only children, and low coverage was found in traveller communities (47.6%) and reduced uptake with subsequent dosage in disadvantaged areas (most deprived: first dose, 90.6%; second dose, 84.9%) [ 100 ]. Protection against shingles and varicella infections among migrants was high, for instance, seroprotection in Syrian migrants in Turkey (91.4%) and asylum seekers in The Netherlands (96%), but coverage by deprivation regions in the UK was lower (most deprived, 54.1%; least deprived, 64.1%) [ 23 , 44 , 101 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the individual level, awareness of personal risk factors, access to health insurance or cost-free services and community vaccination centres were vital to encouraging vaccine uptake [ 18 , 42 , 53 , 66 , 109 ]. Generally, the decision to vaccinate was primarily made by mothers [ 23 ], and the most influential source of parental decisions to vaccinate their children was the healthcare staff, such as nurses and doctors, and, to a lesser extent, information from family and friends, the Ministry of Health and the internet [ 109 , 111 ]. Face-to-face communication was considered a more effective approach to reaching communities and gaining their trust, using community vaccine promotion outreach strategies [ 18 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them were not sufficiently informed about the vaccination that should be administered to the children. Another issue was the communication difficulties, which could have been caused by a language barrier 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue was the communication difficulties, which could have been caused by a language barrier. 19 Refugee children all over the world face many challenges, physically and psychologically. Many of these threats may be unavoidable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%