FEM 2022
DOI: 10.57125/fem.2022.06.30.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccination of pregnant women against COVID-19 under martial law: a narrative review

Abstract: Background: Global vaccination programs against the coronavirus illness of 2019 (COVID-19) have been established as the primary measure to minimise and control the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. During pregnancy, it is assumed that the expectant mother and her fetus are both in danger from the possibility of a viral infection. Aim: to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 for pregnant women and determine the impact of vaccination on pregnancy outcomes. Methods: In this revi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the non-significant superiority of the effect of adding BF to PFME over PFME alone regarding the amount of leakage rate could be attributed to the evaluation tool. Most of the included studies depended on pad tests to reflect the amount and frequency of leakage, but this may cause some limitations on the significance of the superiority of PFME with BF over PFME alone as it is a subjective assessment, which depends on individual reporting, which is variable across individuals and across all included study participants therefore, pad test may not reflect the actual improvement of leakage improvement [56][57][58]. The non-significant results regarding the cure rate are attributed to the very small number of studies assessing this outcome (only three) and the difference between the studies in the definition of the cure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the non-significant superiority of the effect of adding BF to PFME over PFME alone regarding the amount of leakage rate could be attributed to the evaluation tool. Most of the included studies depended on pad tests to reflect the amount and frequency of leakage, but this may cause some limitations on the significance of the superiority of PFME with BF over PFME alone as it is a subjective assessment, which depends on individual reporting, which is variable across individuals and across all included study participants therefore, pad test may not reflect the actual improvement of leakage improvement [56][57][58]. The non-significant results regarding the cure rate are attributed to the very small number of studies assessing this outcome (only three) and the difference between the studies in the definition of the cure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%