“…Of the 28 articles included, 12 (43 %) ( Ayukekbong, 2021 ; Bradfield and Giubilini, 2021 ; Emanuel and Skorton, 2021 ; Frati et al, 2021 ; Green, 2021 ; Gur-Arie et al, 2021 ; Kevat et al, 2021 ; Klompas et al, 2021 ; Mittelman, 2021 ; Talbot, 2021 ; Visagie, 2021 ; White et al, 2021 ) took a pro-mandatory vaccination stance, 13 (46 %) ( Baker and Blakely, 2021 ; Dean, 2021 ; Flood et al, 2021 ; Glasper, 2021b ; Glasper, 2021a ; Hughes et al, 2021 ; Kates et al, 2021 ; Leask et al, 2021 ; Palmer, 2021 ; Parker et al, 2021 ; Stokel-Walker, 2021 ; Osbourne and Clark, 2021 ; Bowen, 2020 ) were neutral or presented both sides of the debate, and three (11 %) were against ( Hayes and Pollock, 2021 ; Khunti et al, 2021 ; Shemtob et al, 2021 ). Seven (58 %) of the twelve authors who were in favour of mandatory vaccination were from the USA ( Emanuel and Skorton, 2021 ; Gur-Arie et al, 2021 ; Klompas et al, 2021 ; Mittelman, 2021 ; Talbot, 2021 ; Visagie, 2021 ; White et al, 2021 ) whilst a similar number, 7 of 13 (54 %) of those who were neutral or presented both sides of the issue were from the UK ( Dean, 2021 ; Glasper, 2021b ; Glasper, 2021a ; Palmer, 2021 ; Parker et al, 2021 ; Stokel-Walker, 2021 ; Osbourne and Clark, 2021 ).…”