2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.79.172103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacancy trapping mechanism for hydrogen bubble formation in metal

Abstract: We reveal the microscopic vacancy trapping mechanism for H bubble formation in W based on firstprinciples calculations of the energetics of H-vacancy interaction and the kinetics of H segregation. Vacancy provides an isosurface of optimal charge density that induces collective H binding on its internal surface, a prerequisite for the formation of H 2 molecule and nucleation of H bubble inside the vacancy. The critical H density on the vacancy surface before the H 2 formation is found to be 10 19-10 20 H atoms … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
193
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
27
193
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the detrapping energy of the defect site has been found to be dependent on the number of hydrogen isotopes bound to the tungsten defects site. This behaviour is somehow quite general, since it has been found by DFT for vacancies [14][15][16][17][18][19], dislocations [21] and grain boundaries [21,22] in tungsten, and it has been recently included in MRE model codes by Schmid et al [23] and Hodille et al [9]. The latter implementation used in the present work, called MHIMS-Reservoir [9], can be summarized with the potential energy diagrams of figure 4.…”
Section: Mre Models: Single Trap-multi-detrapping Energymentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Furthermore, the detrapping energy of the defect site has been found to be dependent on the number of hydrogen isotopes bound to the tungsten defects site. This behaviour is somehow quite general, since it has been found by DFT for vacancies [14][15][16][17][18][19], dislocations [21] and grain boundaries [21,22] in tungsten, and it has been recently included in MRE model codes by Schmid et al [23] and Hodille et al [9]. The latter implementation used in the present work, called MHIMS-Reservoir [9], can be summarized with the potential energy diagrams of figure 4.…”
Section: Mre Models: Single Trap-multi-detrapping Energymentioning
confidence: 52%
“…12,14 To determine the most stable site for a single He atom in perfect or defective Ti 3 AlC 2 , we calculate the solution energy for a He atom at different sites. The solution energy for a He atom in Ti 3 AlC 2 with and without a vacancy is defined as 22,23…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is in good agreement with the previous theoretical predictions and experimental measurements. 6,22 Additionally, it is important to note that the solution energy of He in an Al vacancy is lower than that of a C vacancy, which implies that the Al vacancy exhibits stronger trapping for He than the C vacancy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the tensile stress promoted structure stability, whereas the compressive stress promoted structure instability. The vacant space for S occupation will be smaller because of the compression, leading to higher energy [33]. Furthermore, the relative values of the total energy at the TIS were larger than those of the total energy at the OIS.…”
Section: Stability and Charge Density Distribution Under Stressmentioning
confidence: 94%