The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/443/1/012021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacancy Formation Enthalpy in Polycrystalline Depleted Uranium

Abstract: Abstract. Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy was performed as a function of temperature and beam energy on polycrystalline depleted uranium (DU) foil. Samples were run with varying heat profiles all starting at room temperature. While collecting Doppler-Broadening data, the temperature of the sample was cycled several times. The first heat cycle shows an increasing Sparameter near temperatures of 400K to 500K much lower than the first phase transition of 941K indicating increasing vacancies possibly due to oxy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large variations with temperature only allow us to determine values in the range 1.3 eV < E f v < 2.6 eV. This range is close to that measured by the positron annihilation technique of Matter et al [65], 1.2 ± 0.25 eV, and even closer to that recently reported by Lund et al [66], 1.6 ± 0.16 eV. First-principles calculations of Xiang et al [15] produce a lower value of E f v = 1.08 eV, while Beeler et al [17] obtain 1.32 and 1.38 eV with different density functional approximations.…”
Section: Point Defectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Large variations with temperature only allow us to determine values in the range 1.3 eV < E f v < 2.6 eV. This range is close to that measured by the positron annihilation technique of Matter et al [65], 1.2 ± 0.25 eV, and even closer to that recently reported by Lund et al [66], 1.6 ± 0.16 eV. First-principles calculations of Xiang et al [15] produce a lower value of E f v = 1.08 eV, while Beeler et al [17] obtain 1.32 and 1.38 eV with different density functional approximations.…”
Section: Point Defectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The magnitude of for γ U found in MD mod eling turns out to be overestimated compared with the values found from static calculations by the DFT method [37,38] and from the positron annihilation vac SIA 1 1 1 ; [39,40]. The magnitudes of are within the energy range evaluated for interstials from static calculations in the DFT scope, i.e., from 0.5 to 1.5 eV [38] depending on the defect configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Also, it is possible to calculate vacancy formation energy at high pressures and T = 0 and extrapolate it to P = 0 [4]. The large variation in the experimentally determined vacancy formation energy in γ-uranium (1.2 eV [14]; 0-0.3 eV [15]; 1.6 eV [16,17]) does not allow to judge the correctness of such calculation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%