2021
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776121080100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacancy Formation Energy in the Cubic Phase of Magnetite in the Framework of the DFT+U Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
19
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1), which are free in the ideal cubic phase 32,33 . Our earlier results 28 confirm that the formation energy of a vacancy in the B-sublattice is lower than in the A-(or tetrahedral) sublattice. Calculations of the formation energies of iron interstitial atoms in the DFT+U framework is one of the tasks of this study.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1), which are free in the ideal cubic phase 32,33 . Our earlier results 28 confirm that the formation energy of a vacancy in the B-sublattice is lower than in the A-(or tetrahedral) sublattice. Calculations of the formation energies of iron interstitial atoms in the DFT+U framework is one of the tasks of this study.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…In this work, we present the results of the density functional theory calculations with the Hubbard correction (DFT+U 25,26 ) for the formation energies of vacancies and interstitials and compare the results with E f exp FP . Following Liu and Di Valentin 27 and our recent study 28 , we use the static DFT+U model of cubic magnetite without symmetry constraints on electron density that predicts the existence of a small band gap above T V that is in agreement with several experiments [29][30][31] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations