2005
DOI: 10.1007/11547686_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VA-Files vs. R*-Trees in Distance Join Queries

Abstract: Abstract. In modern database applications the similarity of complex objects is examined by performing distance-based queries (e.g. nearest neighbour search) on data of high dimensionality. Most multidimensional indexing methods have failed to efficiently support these queries in arbitrary high-dimensional datasets (due to the dimensionality curse). Similarity join queries and K closest pairs queries are the most representative distance join queries, where two highdimensional datasets are combined. These querie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods fail to handle high-dimensional closest pair search due to the curse of dimensionality. Corral et al [11] propose a join method based on the VA-file, which is an array structure rather than a tree structure. Angiulli et al [4] adopt the Z-curve to reduce the dimensionality and generate candidates in onedimensional spaces.…”
Section: High Dimensional Closest Pair Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods fail to handle high-dimensional closest pair search due to the curse of dimensionality. Corral et al [11] propose a join method based on the VA-file, which is an array structure rather than a tree structure. Angiulli et al [4] adopt the Z-curve to reduce the dimensionality and generate candidates in onedimensional spaces.…”
Section: High Dimensional Closest Pair Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that similarity join methods [ 178 , 179 ] have been developed to find all paired objects that are closer than a user-specified distance. However, these techniques to process similarity join cannot be effectively applied to kNN Joins since it is hard to predict the search radius in kNN Joins [ 180 , 181 ].…”
Section: Knn Join Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%