2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016337102256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This study suggests compromised breast cancer survival among postmenopausal women who reported drinking at least one alcoholic beverage per week, a preliminary finding that warrants further investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With all-cause mortality as the endpoint seven studies reported no association (Ewertz et al , 1991; Zhang et al , 1995; Holmes et al , 1999; Saxe et al , 1999; McEligot et al , 2006; Franceschi et al , 2009; Kwan et al , 2010) and four studies reported an inverse association between alcohol consumption and overall survival (Barnett et al , 2008; Reding et al , 2008; Beasley et al , 2010; Flatt et al , 2010). In contrast, when the endpoint was breast cancer-specific mortality or breast cancer recurrence, two studies reported no association (Rohan et al , 1993; Goodwin et al , 2003), while four studies reported an increase in risk with increasing alcohol consumption (Hebert et al , 1998; Green McDonald et al , 2002; Beasley et al , 2010; Kwan et al , 2010). We observed no significant association between alcohol intake and breast cancer-specific mortality, although there was the suggestion of an increased risk among the small number of women consuming 10 g per day (corresponding to approximately 0.75 to 1 drink/day) or more (HR=1.36; 95% CI 0.82–2.26) (Suzuki et al , 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With all-cause mortality as the endpoint seven studies reported no association (Ewertz et al , 1991; Zhang et al , 1995; Holmes et al , 1999; Saxe et al , 1999; McEligot et al , 2006; Franceschi et al , 2009; Kwan et al , 2010) and four studies reported an inverse association between alcohol consumption and overall survival (Barnett et al , 2008; Reding et al , 2008; Beasley et al , 2010; Flatt et al , 2010). In contrast, when the endpoint was breast cancer-specific mortality or breast cancer recurrence, two studies reported no association (Rohan et al , 1993; Goodwin et al , 2003), while four studies reported an increase in risk with increasing alcohol consumption (Hebert et al , 1998; Green McDonald et al , 2002; Beasley et al , 2010; Kwan et al , 2010). We observed no significant association between alcohol intake and breast cancer-specific mortality, although there was the suggestion of an increased risk among the small number of women consuming 10 g per day (corresponding to approximately 0.75 to 1 drink/day) or more (HR=1.36; 95% CI 0.82–2.26) (Suzuki et al , 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(Ewertz et al , 1991; Zhang et al , 1995; Holmes et al , 1999; Saxe et al , 1999; McEligot et al , 2006; Franceschi et al , 2009; Kwan et al , 2010). When breast cancer-specific outcomes have been examined, four studies have reported an increased risk with breast cancer-specific mortality or recurrence (Hebert et al , 1998; Green McDonald et al , 2002; Beasley et al , 2010; Kwan et al , 2010), and two studies reported no association (Rohan et al , 1993; Goodwin et al , 2003). Given these inconclusive results, the aim of this study was to investigate whether pre-diagnosis alcohol intake was associated with breast cancer-specific and overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer in the population-based Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 11 studies that reported on BCSS, six studies reported no association (1, 12, 14, 18, 20, 22) and four studies reported that increased alcohol intake was associated with increased breast cancer-specific mortality (2, 7, 19, 21). The reporting of alcohol consumption in these studies was very heterogeneous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it was not possible to combine estimates in a formal meta-analysis. One study did not report details about levels of exposure (12), one study did not use non- or minimal drinkers as a reference group (20), and two studies modeled alcohol intake as a continuous variable (19, 21). Both of these reported that alcohol consumption was associated with a poorer prognosis, but the sample sizes were small and in one, the effect was limited to beer drinkers (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that there could be factors other than the biological or treatment factors that could have contributed to the superior survival in the high EL group. A range of factors were presumed to be included in this category: adherence to breast cancer screening [ 22 ], socioeconomic status [ 21 , 23 - 25 ], exercise [ 26 ], diet [ 26 ], smoking [ 27 - 29 ], etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%