1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021045024896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A microclimatic effect from the intercrop similar to the effect of crop residue that is beneficial for slugs has been assumed (Gaba et al, 2015), yet studies have found a reduction in slug damage for the main crop in intercropped systems (Glen, 2000;Brooks et al, 2005;Choi et al, 2006). The mechanisms for damage reduction are not wellunderstood, but dilution effects, based on the generalist feeding requirements of slugs, antifeedant effects and benefits for slug predators have been documented (Cook et al, 1997;Dodds et al, 1999;Le Gall and Tooker, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A microclimatic effect from the intercrop similar to the effect of crop residue that is beneficial for slugs has been assumed (Gaba et al, 2015), yet studies have found a reduction in slug damage for the main crop in intercropped systems (Glen, 2000;Brooks et al, 2005;Choi et al, 2006). The mechanisms for damage reduction are not wellunderstood, but dilution effects, based on the generalist feeding requirements of slugs, antifeedant effects and benefits for slug predators have been documented (Cook et al, 1997;Dodds et al, 1999;Le Gall and Tooker, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%