2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010319117701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they argued that many recent objections against laboratory experiments are misguided due to a misunderstanding of the nature of evidence in science and of the kind of data collected in the laboratory, and that more laboratory experiments should be conducted. This argument is consistent with the claims of those who argued that many experiments do not have to represent the 'real world' in any direct way, and that a proper approach to address external validity questions that suit the various goals of experimentalists should be developed (e.g., Vissers 2001;Guala and Mittone 2005;Schram 2005). In fact, many experiments are aimed at contributing to a body of experimental knowledge to be applied case by case, referred as a 'library of robust phenomena' by Guala and Mittone (2005).…”
Section: Resistance To Experimental Approach In Building Economics Resupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, they argued that many recent objections against laboratory experiments are misguided due to a misunderstanding of the nature of evidence in science and of the kind of data collected in the laboratory, and that more laboratory experiments should be conducted. This argument is consistent with the claims of those who argued that many experiments do not have to represent the 'real world' in any direct way, and that a proper approach to address external validity questions that suit the various goals of experimentalists should be developed (e.g., Vissers 2001;Guala and Mittone 2005;Schram 2005). In fact, many experiments are aimed at contributing to a body of experimental knowledge to be applied case by case, referred as a 'library of robust phenomena' by Guala and Mittone (2005).…”
Section: Resistance To Experimental Approach In Building Economics Resupporting
confidence: 83%
“…First, one might see how neo-Calvinists might parry Echeverria's charge that they are inconsistent in claiming that natural reason cannot produce a reliable knowledge of God and yet that all creatures do know God by virtue of general revelation. 85 However, a fruit of this article is contributing to an ever-emerging recognition that strongly psychological and Romantic motifs exist in Herman Bavinck's writings as well, such that a contrast between him and his nephew should not be overstated. Again, this does not mean that no rational reflection ought to be done in order to produce in more explicit forms what is already known by general revelation, but such rational reflections are always subordinate and second moments -they are always provisional and ought to be normed by special revelation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bavinck was 'more psychological and less philosophical' than his uncle, and that gradually 'his thinking became more theologically distant' from Herman Bavinck. 85 However, a fruit of this article is contributing to an ever-emerging recognition that strongly psychological and Romantic motifs exist in Herman Bavinck's writings as well, such that a contrast between him and his nephew should not be overstated. This recognition locates this article in a growing stream of literature that indicates the eclecticism of Herman Bavinck's thinking: he self-consciously sought to embody a kind of Reformed eclecticism that sought to utilize the conceptual tools from both modern and classical milieus, and saw no need to set the two in binary terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite this disadvantage, simulation can be used as a research tool to analyze complex processes and compensate for the disadvantage. Furthermore, an online game can have high external validity when predicting behaviors (Feinstein & Cannon, 2003;Vissers et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%