1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8127(97)00019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that clusters will be comparatively rare at high redshifts in a Ω NR = 1 universe compared to models with cosmological constant. Only less than 10 per cent of massive clusters form at z > 0.5 in a Ω NR = 1 universe whereas almost all massive clusters would have formed by z ≈ 0.5 in a universe with cosmological constant [212,213,214,215,75]. (A simple way of understanding this effect is by noting that if the clusters are not in place by z ≈ 0.5, say, they could not have formed by today in models with cosmological constant since there is very little growth of fluctuation between these two epochs.)…”
Section: Structure Formation and Constraints On Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that clusters will be comparatively rare at high redshifts in a Ω NR = 1 universe compared to models with cosmological constant. Only less than 10 per cent of massive clusters form at z > 0.5 in a Ω NR = 1 universe whereas almost all massive clusters would have formed by z ≈ 0.5 in a universe with cosmological constant [212,213,214,215,75]. (A simple way of understanding this effect is by noting that if the clusters are not in place by z ≈ 0.5, say, they could not have formed by today in models with cosmological constant since there is very little growth of fluctuation between these two epochs.)…”
Section: Structure Formation and Constraints On Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 99%