2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11723-8_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

V-Net and U-Net for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation in a Small Dataset of Perfusion Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brain tumor [106], [107], [110]- [112], [114]- [118] Base U-net [18], [109], [120] 3D U-net [81] Adversarial net; GAN [59], [108] Residual block [113] Dense block [87] Cascaded U-net [92] Residual block; Parallel U-net [44] Inception block; Up skip connections [45] Dense block; Inception block [119] 3D U-net; Residual block [19] 3D U-net, Inception block, Residual block Brain tissue [103], [121]- [124] Base U-net [28], [160] 3D U-net [161] 2.5D U-net [54] Residual block [101] Parallel U-net [41] Attention gate; Residual block White matter tracts [126], [127] U-net with modified skip connections [125] Base U-net [89] Cascaded U-net Fetal brain [128]- [130] Base U-net [131] Base U-net; 3D U-net Stroke lesion/thrombus [133]- [136] Base U-net [132] 3D U-net [69] Dense block; Inception block Cardiovascular structures [138], [140]- [142], [144], …”
Section: Reference Model/methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brain tumor [106], [107], [110]- [112], [114]- [118] Base U-net [18], [109], [120] 3D U-net [81] Adversarial net; GAN [59], [108] Residual block [113] Dense block [87] Cascaded U-net [92] Residual block; Parallel U-net [44] Inception block; Up skip connections [45] Dense block; Inception block [119] 3D U-net; Residual block [19] 3D U-net, Inception block, Residual block Brain tissue [103], [121]- [124] Base U-net [28], [160] 3D U-net [161] 2.5D U-net [54] Residual block [101] Parallel U-net [41] Attention gate; Residual block White matter tracts [126], [127] U-net with modified skip connections [125] Base U-net [89] Cascaded U-net Fetal brain [128]- [130] Base U-net [131] Base U-net; 3D U-net Stroke lesion/thrombus [133]- [136] Base U-net [132] 3D U-net [69] Dense block; Inception block Cardiovascular structures [138], [140]- [142], [144], …”
Section: Reference Model/methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various U-net models have been applied on MR images for brain tumor diagnosis [18], [19], [59], [45], [81], [106], [107], [87], [108]- [111], [92], [112]- [119], [44], [120]. U-net has also been applied on brain tissue for investigation of neurological conditions [54], [101], [103], [121]- [124], analysis of white matter tissue [125]- [127], [89], fetal brain development [128]- [131], and stroke lesions [69], [132]- [136].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. It justifies selection of V-Net architecture trained with D+CE, which perform best for segmenting MC in terms of all chosen metrics and achieves an average Dice score of 91.4 % and Cross-Entropy of 0.154, which is of the state-of-the-art level in various well-annotated segmentation reports [36,37]. For TB segmentation, V-Net also outperform 3D U-Net and 3D U-Net with attention in terms of HD and it is not much inferior in other metrics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In comparison to U-net, V-net learns a residual function at each stage and examines 3D pictures, using volumetric filters. Both networks performed outstandingly, being named a state-of-the-art in the medical image segmentation [ 55 ].…”
Section: How Do Machines Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%