2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(V)/Hydrotalcite, (V)/Al2O3, (V)/TiO2 and (V)/SBA-15 catalysts for the partial oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) presented high selectivity to acetaldehyde being the acetaldehyde diethyl acetal the main secondary product. Surely, the production of acetaldehyde diethyl acetal was due to the presence of acid sites which facilitated the reaction of acetaldehyde with ethanol forming this product [17,24]. In all cases, the selectivity to acetaldehyde was higher than 65 %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2) presented high selectivity to acetaldehyde being the acetaldehyde diethyl acetal the main secondary product. Surely, the production of acetaldehyde diethyl acetal was due to the presence of acid sites which facilitated the reaction of acetaldehyde with ethanol forming this product [17,24]. In all cases, the selectivity to acetaldehyde was higher than 65 %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The two blank tests were carried out using the same conditions than for the normal tests. The procedure for introducing the catalyst and SiC was described by J. M. Hidalgo et al [17]. A continuous flow reactor (stainless steel 316) with length of 1000 mm was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Plasma treatment conditions and parameters were: AC source voltage 20 kV, frequency 3 kHz, nominal power 120 W, modification time periods 5 s. XRF, XRD, specific surface area BET and NH 3 temperature programmed desorption (TPD-NH 3 ) were carried out using the same methodology described in the literature. 17 Mercury porosimetry measurements were performed on a Micromeritics AutoPore IV 9510 mercury porosimeter. All samples were dried before the analysis in a glass-cell at 110 °C under vacuum for 16 hours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%