2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2739475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

V(CLV): Examining Variance in Models of Customer Lifetime Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our model is more flexible than previously published customer-based corporate valuation models (e.g., in terms of the dynamics that it can accommodate), it has nevertheless remained parametrically parsimonious because the available data are limited and will likely stay that way for the foreseeable future. For example, it is highly unlikely that firms will begin to disclose the kinds of data required to properly account for other sources of customer value, such as the referral value of a customer (Kemper 2010; Kumar et al 2010; Kumar, Petersen, and Leone 2007), the impact of social media (Luo, Zhang, and Duan 2013; Yu, Duan, and Cao 2013), customer satisfaction (Anderson, Fornell, and Mazvancheryl 2004; Homburg, Koschate, and Hoyer 2005; Luo and Bhattacharya 2006), or heterogeneity in the spend per customer (McCarthy, Fader, and Hardie 2016). At the same time, indirect proxies for these factors may be obtainable in some cases through external data sources for a small subset of companies.…”
Section: General Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our model is more flexible than previously published customer-based corporate valuation models (e.g., in terms of the dynamics that it can accommodate), it has nevertheless remained parametrically parsimonious because the available data are limited and will likely stay that way for the foreseeable future. For example, it is highly unlikely that firms will begin to disclose the kinds of data required to properly account for other sources of customer value, such as the referral value of a customer (Kemper 2010; Kumar et al 2010; Kumar, Petersen, and Leone 2007), the impact of social media (Luo, Zhang, and Duan 2013; Yu, Duan, and Cao 2013), customer satisfaction (Anderson, Fornell, and Mazvancheryl 2004; Homburg, Koschate, and Hoyer 2005; Luo and Bhattacharya 2006), or heterogeneity in the spend per customer (McCarthy, Fader, and Hardie 2016). At the same time, indirect proxies for these factors may be obtainable in some cases through external data sources for a small subset of companies.…”
Section: General Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We infer a long right tail to Longtime Larry's pretax RLV, which drives up Longtime Larry's expected pretax RLV but also implies a much higher variance about that expectation. Longtime Larry is more valuable but is also more risky (McCarthy, Fader, and Hardie 2016).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We infer a long right tail to Longtime Larry's pre-tax RLV -this drives up Longtime Larry's expected pre-tax RLV, but also implies a much higher variance about that expectation. Longtime Larry is more valuable but is also more risky (McCarthy, Fader, and Hardie 2016).…”
Section: Comparison Of Residual Value By Tenurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the variance of the customers' CLV is important because the customer base of most companies is by no means uniform, and customers of different levels have different needs, which should be addressed at an individual level for proper customer relationship management. 13,14 The EMP measure, as proposed by Verbraken et al, assumes a fixed and equal CLV for all customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%