2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13634-017-0500-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UWB pulse detection and TOA estimation using GLRT

Abstract: In this paper, a novel statistical approach is presented for time-of-arrival (TOA) estimation based on first path (FP) pulse detection using a sub-Nyquist sampling ultra-wide band (UWB) receiver. The TOA measurement accuracy, which cannot be improved by averaging of the received signal, can be enhanced by the statistical processing of a number of TOA measurements. The TOA statistics are modeled and analyzed for a UWB receiver using threshold crossing detection of a pulse signal with noise. The detection and es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we could also opted for employing some sort of likelihood ratio test, such as a generalized likelihood ratio test [29], [30], to detect the attacker. However, such schemes typically require a tuning of thresholds for a chosen false alarm (probability of detection) in order to obtain the desired probability of of detection (false alarm), and might require additional knowledge of model parameters (e.g., noise variance) [30]. Hence, the proposed detection scheme seems intuitive and simple, and does not require any additional knowledge about the model parameters.…”
Section: A Attacker Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we could also opted for employing some sort of likelihood ratio test, such as a generalized likelihood ratio test [29], [30], to detect the attacker. However, such schemes typically require a tuning of thresholds for a chosen false alarm (probability of detection) in order to obtain the desired probability of of detection (false alarm), and might require additional knowledge of model parameters (e.g., noise variance) [30]. Hence, the proposed detection scheme seems intuitive and simple, and does not require any additional knowledge about the model parameters.…”
Section: A Attacker Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%