Over the last several decades, it has been established that proteolytic removal of short, non-helical terminal peptides (telopeptides) from type I collagen significantly alters the kinetics of in vitro fibrillogenesis. However, it has also been observed that the protein is still capable of forming fibers even after complete removal of telopeptides. This study focuses on the characterization of this fibrillogenesis competency of collagen. We have combined traditional kinetic and thermodynamic assays of fibrillogenesis efficacy with direct measurements of interaction between collagen molecules in fibers by osmotic stress and x-ray diffraction. We found that telopeptide cleavage by pepsin or by up to 20 h of Pronase treatment altered fiber assembly kinetics, but the same fraction of the protein still assembled into fibers. Small-angle x-ray diffraction showed that these fibers have normal, native-like D-stagger. Force measurements indicated that collagen-collagen interactions in fibers were not affected by either pepsin or Pronase treatment. In contrast, prolonged (>20 h) Pronase treatment resulted in cleavage of the triple helical domain as indicated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The triple-helix cleavage correlated with the observed decrease in the fraction of protein capable of forming fibers and with the measured loss of attraction between helices in fibers. These data suggest that telopeptides play a catalytic role, whereas the information necessary for proper molecular recognition and fiber assembly is encoded in the triple helical domain of collagen.Type I collagen is a major component of the extracellular matrix in all higher vertebrates, e.g. it is the main structural protein of skin, bone, and tendon (see, for example, Refs. 1 and 2). Each molecule is a heterotrimer composed of two ␣1(I) chains and one ␣2(I) chain. It contains a long triple helical domain (ϳ1000 residues from each chain) and short, non-helical terminal peptides (telopeptides).In vitro, under appropriate conditions, type I molecules spontaneously form fibers that are virtually indistinguishable from native fibers by electron microscopy (see, for example, Ref.3).X-ray diffraction patterns from such reconstituted fibers and from native fibers are similar as well (4 -7). It is commonly believed that type I collagen contains all structural information that is necessary for its self-assembly into fibers, except maybe for some tissue-specific factors (see, for example, Ref. 8). However, the location of the "coding" regions, the nature of this information, and how it is "translated" into intermolecular forces responsible for fibrillogenesis are still poorly understood.One of the debated issues is the role of telopeptides. Telopeptides form covalent cross-links with triple helical regions on opposing molecules (see, for example, Refs. 9 and 10). It is believed that this occurs after completion of fibrillogenesis and that the cross-links stabilize rather than create appropriate molecular arrangement. It was also suggested that telopept...