2012
DOI: 10.1582/leukos.2012.09.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV Radiation as an Attractor for Insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been observed that different bulb types attract insects at varying levels (Nirmal et al, 2017;Ebadi et al, 2018). Contrary to the findings of the current study, Barghini & de Medeiros (2012) and Wakefield et al (2017) in their studies opined that LEDs are less attractive to many insect species than their incandescent, compact fluorescent and metallic halide counterparts as many insect species according to them, are disproportionately attracted to UV lights. However, even though the difference between LED and incandescent bulbs with respect to attractiveness to G. bimaculatus in the present study was due to random variation, that LED was more attractive than incandescent as observed in the present study, buttresses the findings of Pawson & Bader (2014) who showed that of Incandescent, Compact Fluorescent and LED bulbs; LED bulbs was most attractive to insects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been observed that different bulb types attract insects at varying levels (Nirmal et al, 2017;Ebadi et al, 2018). Contrary to the findings of the current study, Barghini & de Medeiros (2012) and Wakefield et al (2017) in their studies opined that LEDs are less attractive to many insect species than their incandescent, compact fluorescent and metallic halide counterparts as many insect species according to them, are disproportionately attracted to UV lights. However, even though the difference between LED and incandescent bulbs with respect to attractiveness to G. bimaculatus in the present study was due to random variation, that LED was more attractive than incandescent as observed in the present study, buttresses the findings of Pawson & Bader (2014) who showed that of Incandescent, Compact Fluorescent and LED bulbs; LED bulbs was most attractive to insects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Among the common positively phototactic insects, moths (Frank, 1988(Frank, , 2006MacGregor, Pocock, Fox, & Evans, 2015) and aquatic insects (Perkin, Hölker, & Tockner, 2014;Yoon, Kim, Kim, Jo, & Bae, 2010) are best studied. Comparative surveys have shown that, relative to their calculated visibility, short wavelengths are disproportionately attractive to many insects (Barghini & de Medeiros, 2012;Mikkola, 1972; see also Wakefield et al, 2016 for a discussion of infrared wavelengths). Although most insects can perceive short wavelengths (Briscoe & Chittka, 2001;Kelber & Roth, 2006), certain families of moths are more attracted to them than others (van Langevelde, Ettema, Donners, WallisDeVries, & Groenendijk, 2011;Somers-Yeates et al, 2013, see also Wölfling, Becker, Uhl, Traub, & Fiedler, 2016).…”
Section: Desensitization Below)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these groups of insects are positively phototac- Ffrench-Constant, 2013;van Langevelde et al, 2011). Many studies have compared attractiveness of different light sources to nocturnal flying insects, specifically moths (Barghini & De Medeiros, 2012;Eisenbeis, 2006;Eisenbeis & Eick, 2010;Pawson & Bader, 2014;Somers-Yeates et al, 2013;van Langevelde et al, 2011). Nevertheless, despite this body of theory we still cannot predict insect flight to light based on the spectral output of a light source .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%