2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV-enhanced cytotoxicity of thiol-capped CdTe quantum dots in human pancreatic carcinoma cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the concentration of CdTe QDs required to promote endothelial toxicity (TC 50 ) in our study was much lower than most of that in other cell types (Chen et al 2010;Choi et al 2007,(Su et al 2010, (Su et al 2009;Wu et al 2010), (Chang et al 2009;Chen et al 2010;Choi et al 2007;Lovric et al 2005;Shiohara et al 2004;Tang et al 2008). A possible explanation for this difference is that the tested cell types have different cellular sensitivity to QDs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, the concentration of CdTe QDs required to promote endothelial toxicity (TC 50 ) in our study was much lower than most of that in other cell types (Chen et al 2010;Choi et al 2007,(Su et al 2010, (Su et al 2009;Wu et al 2010), (Chang et al 2009;Chen et al 2010;Choi et al 2007;Lovric et al 2005;Shiohara et al 2004;Tang et al 2008). A possible explanation for this difference is that the tested cell types have different cellular sensitivity to QDs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…molarity was about 0.227 nM to 227 nM). According to previous reports, the concentration which we tested in our following experiments is similar to the doses that have actually used in in vivo bioimaging (up to hundreds of nanomole) (Ballou et al 2007;Ballou et al 2004;Cai et al 2006;Gao et al 2004;Jayagopal et al 2007;Larson et al 2003;Tada et al 2007) or tested in other in vitro toxicological studies (up to hundreds of nanomole or μg/mL) 20 (Chang et al 2009;Chen et al 2010;Choi et al 2007;Lovric et al 2005;Su et al 2009;Su et al 2010;Tang et al 2008;Wu et al 2010). Then, our cell viability assays (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unrestricted interactions of any kind of materials, including QDs, have the potential to be toxic, especially at higher concentration and/or with enhanced adsorption/internalization. Beyond the changes over cell function, more evident effects are prone to be caused by QDs, including cellular ones such: (i) changes in cell morphology (Chang et al, 2009), (ii) oxidative stress (Lovrić, et al, 2005), (iii) release of heavy metal compounds (Kirchner et al, 2005) and (iv) genetic and epigenetic damage (Choi et al, 2008), as well as local inflammation in live rats, as we have recently reported.…”
Section: Quantum Dots In Biomedical Research 285mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, their toxicity in biological environments has not been fully understood [105]. Many groups are currently investigating the toxicity of cadmium-based QDs in vitro and in vivo [106][107][108][109]. Several studies showed no toxicity in small animals at optimal cadmium-based QDs concentration for periods up to several months [13,86].…”
Section: Toxicity Of Quantum Dots In Vitro and In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%