Handbook of Clinical Child Neuropsychology 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-78867-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing a Neuropsychological Paradigm for Understanding Common Educational and Psychological Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, practitioners appear to be divided between those who advocate a fixed battery approach (administering a consistent, standardized battery to all students regardless of the referral question) and those who advocate a flexible battery approach (using a case-study analysis focusing on the dynamic clinical interactions and "the process" to better understand the individual). Integrative models of assessment incorporating elements of each of these approaches have become increasingly more popular (D'Amato et al, 2005b;Rhodes et al). Selecting aspects of both approaches allows one to emphasize the person being assessed as well as the individual's fit with his or her environment, allowing practitioners to select diverse assessment tools based on the unique needs of the individual (Rhodes et al).…”
Section: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches To Interventionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, practitioners appear to be divided between those who advocate a fixed battery approach (administering a consistent, standardized battery to all students regardless of the referral question) and those who advocate a flexible battery approach (using a case-study analysis focusing on the dynamic clinical interactions and "the process" to better understand the individual). Integrative models of assessment incorporating elements of each of these approaches have become increasingly more popular (D'Amato et al, 2005b;Rhodes et al). Selecting aspects of both approaches allows one to emphasize the person being assessed as well as the individual's fit with his or her environment, allowing practitioners to select diverse assessment tools based on the unique needs of the individual (Rhodes et al).…”
Section: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches To Interventionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Neuroimaging studies utilize brain activation patterns observed during the performance of tasks that involve various aspects of brain function related to intelligence. Perceptual modalities link cognitive processing to human behavior and psychometrics and thereby identify measures of individual differences (Rhodes, D'Amato, & Rothlisberg, ). Published data may bring about the need for current theories to be revised if new findings challenge existing assumptions.…”
Section: The Application Of Neuroscience and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also is important to note that the Bayley-II has been revised since our administration of this assessment. The current Bayley-III (Bayley, 2006) expands on the Bayley-II's utility in assessing the cognitive and motor functioning of infants and toddlers (Johnson & Marlow, 2006;Rhodes, D'Amato, & Rothlisberg, 2009) and assesses five developmental domains (i.e., cognitive, language, motor, socioemotional, and adaptive behavior). Although the BRS has been replaced by two parent-report measures (the Social-Emotional scale and the Adaptive Behavior scale) in the Bayley-III, a brief behavioral observation measure also is included in the newer version to document examiners' impressions of child behavior during test administration.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%