2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70413-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization patterns of extended-release niacin in Canada: Analysis of an administrative claims database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from this 5-year retrospective administrative claims analysis indicate that persistence with index statin therapy is poor in patients with elevated TG (≥ 150 mg/dL) or high TG (200–499 mg/dL), diabetes, and/or ASCVD. This result is consistent with a number of previous studies over the past two decades, and confirms that poor long-term statin persistence remains an issue of concern for patients with high CV disease risk, including those with elevated TG who may be at increased risk of CV events and patients with diabetes [46, 8, 10, 16, 17]. This highlights the fact that very little, if anything, has changed in the last two decades with regard to improving statin persistence, which remains abysmal in all groups probed in our study, all of whom are at high risk of CV events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from this 5-year retrospective administrative claims analysis indicate that persistence with index statin therapy is poor in patients with elevated TG (≥ 150 mg/dL) or high TG (200–499 mg/dL), diabetes, and/or ASCVD. This result is consistent with a number of previous studies over the past two decades, and confirms that poor long-term statin persistence remains an issue of concern for patients with high CV disease risk, including those with elevated TG who may be at increased risk of CV events and patients with diabetes [46, 8, 10, 16, 17]. This highlights the fact that very little, if anything, has changed in the last two decades with regard to improving statin persistence, which remains abysmal in all groups probed in our study, all of whom are at high risk of CV events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, adherence and persistence to statin therapy are low, and this has been shown to negatively impact clinical outcomes and residual cardiovascular (CV) risk [2, 3]. Nearly a decade ago, statin persistence was reported to be less than 50% after 1 year [4]. A more recent study found that the proportion of days covered with a statin after a median follow-up of 2.2 years was 76%, with 40.5% of patients having poor adherence after 2 years [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analyses of the Optum Research Database found that only approximately 20% of patients were still on statin therapy after 5 years, even in those with additional risk factors. This finding is in line with what has been previously reported [39][40][41][42][43]. Shroufi and Powles further estimated that an improvement in adherence from 50 to 75% could cut the number of deaths related to CVD by 200% [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a claims database, Catalan and LeLorier [26] showed that in a cohort of patients initiating a statin only 33% were still adherent after 1 year. Dorais et al [27], reported that, among 19,727 patients initiating a statin, 53.3% had discontinued treatment after 1 year. Wouters et al [28] explored the many reasons for statin non-adherence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%