2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of water-reducing admixtures in cemented paste backfill of sulphide-rich mill tailings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle size distribution, as the most significant physical characteristic of fill material of tailings, was analyzed using a Mastersizer2000 laser particle size analyzer (Malvern, Shanghai, China); the results are summarized in Figure 5 and Table 2. Table 2 indicates that the tailings of ZGIM can be classified as super fine tailings since more than 60 wt % of the sample was finer than 20 µm and its maximum diameter is only 211 µm [39]. The portion of tailings finer than 20 µm plays an important role in paste pumpability [15].…”
Section: Tailingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle size distribution, as the most significant physical characteristic of fill material of tailings, was analyzed using a Mastersizer2000 laser particle size analyzer (Malvern, Shanghai, China); the results are summarized in Figure 5 and Table 2. Table 2 indicates that the tailings of ZGIM can be classified as super fine tailings since more than 60 wt % of the sample was finer than 20 µm and its maximum diameter is only 211 µm [39]. The portion of tailings finer than 20 µm plays an important role in paste pumpability [15].…”
Section: Tailingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As low as 7° internal friction angle was measured from 360 days curing CPB specimens with 5% cement ratio. Mixes with silt dominant particle size distribution, ∼77% solid (cement+tailings) content including 5-7% cement in solid and ∼23% water content by weight, which were tested in this study are typical CPB materials [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. As 25 o was found to be a practically acceptable value of internal friction angle for CPB materials having no longer curing time than the period for start of the sulphate attack, cohesion values of CPB materials can be estimated using Equation 3 for different UCS values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maple-wood filler, Nano-silica, fly-ash, granulated blast-furnace slag (GBFS) and silica fume were added into CPB as partial binding agent to improve its mechanical performance [19][20][21][22][23]. Ercikdi et al [24] reported the influence of different WRAs on rheology and short and long term performance of CPB. Li and Fall [25] observed that sulphate has negative effect on strength, intensity and rate of self-desiccation of the CPB in early curing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%