2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/405940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Super BAC Pools and Fluidigm Access Array Platform for High-Throughput BAC Clone Identification: Proof of Concept

Abstract: Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries are critical for identifying full-length genomic sequences, correlating genetic and physical maps, and comparative genomics. Here we describe the utilization of the Fluidigm access array genotyping system in conjunction with KASPar genotyping technology to identify individual BAC clones corresponding to specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from an Amplicon Express seven-plate super pooled Amaranthus hypochondriacus BAC library. Ninety-six SNP loci, spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alignment of the BAC end sequence pairs and FGS scaffolds with the amaranth assembly affirms the quality of the genome assembly and suggests the potential for using the BAC library to further consolidate the assembly. A seven‐plate, super‐pooled version of the BAC library is available and was previously shown to be amendable to high‐throughput BAC clone identification using the Fluidigm EP1 system (Maughan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alignment of the BAC end sequence pairs and FGS scaffolds with the amaranth assembly affirms the quality of the genome assembly and suggests the potential for using the BAC library to further consolidate the assembly. A seven‐plate, super‐pooled version of the BAC library is available and was previously shown to be amendable to high‐throughput BAC clone identification using the Fluidigm EP1 system (Maughan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This left a panel of 43 functioning SNPs for analyses. To delimit the size of the SC5-1 introgression, the F 1 plants were genotyped first with the SNP panel by competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and KASPar chemistry (KBioscience Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK) using the Fluidigm (Fluidigm Corp., South San Francisco, CA) nanofluidic 48.48 dynamic array (Wang et al, 2009 ) according to Maughan et al ( 2012 ). Then, three of the 43 SNPs genotyped using KASPar and flanking the ends of the introgression (sca00022_3549755, located at 2,923,752 basepairs (bp) and sca00022_5424269 located at 4,891,016 bp) and another located inside the QTL interval (sca00022_4484619 located at 3,951,366 bp) (Table S2 ) were chosen for genotyping the F 2 and subsequent generations with TaqMan® chemistry (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) using the SNP genotyping in Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%