2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/271/1/012001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as partial replacement of cement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Malyadri and Supriya (2015), the strength parameters of concrete increased by using 5% sugarcane bagasse ash as a partial substitute for cement. A very similar trend of strength improvement was also reported in another study by Mangi et al (2017). Whereas Kawade et al (2013) concluded that up to 15% of sugarcane bagasse ash can be used favorably without compromising the primary properties of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to Malyadri and Supriya (2015), the strength parameters of concrete increased by using 5% sugarcane bagasse ash as a partial substitute for cement. A very similar trend of strength improvement was also reported in another study by Mangi et al (2017). Whereas Kawade et al (2013) concluded that up to 15% of sugarcane bagasse ash can be used favorably without compromising the primary properties of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…7. The following Equation (1) indicates the compressive and tensile strength correlatealong with R 2 coefficients of determination, as follows: y = 1.1571e 0.0196fcu R 2 = 0.9654 (1) where, x-axis is the compressive strength (MPa) and y-axis is splitting tensile strength (MPa).…”
Section: Compressive and Tensile Strength Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand of Portland cement is increased gradually due to rise in the concrete development works around the world [1]. Since the huge production of Portland cement has great environmental concern in terms of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions [2], several studies have been carried out to find more environmentally friendly supplementary cementitiousmaterials [1,[3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The utilization of CBA is still limited due to its comparatively higher content of unburned carbon and diverse structural features, compared to fly ash [4]. Considering the environmental benefits, the reuse of industrial waste in concrete production is the best alternative [5,6]. The particle size of CBA is large and similar to fine and coarse aggregates, therefore, previously researchers [2,5,[7][8][9] considered CBA 2 of 10 as a fine aggregate replacement in concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%