2019
DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i3.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of safe male circumcision among adult men in a fishing community in rural Uganda

Abstract: Background: In Uganda, most-at-riskpopulations(MARPs) such as fishing communities remain vulnerable to preventable HIV acquisition. Safe Male Circumcision (SMC) has been incorporated into Uganda’s HIV prevention strategies. This study aimed at determining SMC utilization and associated factors among adult men in a rural fishing community in Uganda.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural fishing village in central Uganda. Stratified random sampling of 369 fishermen aged 18-54 yearswas used acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…documented a rate of 53.8% among youth aged 15–24 years in Kasensero, Rakai district (n = 134); the proportion of circumcised youth was higher among HIV-negative males (n = 122; 58%) than HIV-positive males (n = 12; 27.9%) [ 38 ]. The lowest prevalence was documented in a study by Lubogo et al [ 64 ]; 8.4% (31/369) of the participants had been circumcised in a safe male circumcision designated health facility. Factors associated with circumcision included peer support (AOR = 5.88; 95%CI = 1.66–20.00) and perceived procedural safety of circumcision (AOR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.16–21.17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…documented a rate of 53.8% among youth aged 15–24 years in Kasensero, Rakai district (n = 134); the proportion of circumcised youth was higher among HIV-negative males (n = 122; 58%) than HIV-positive males (n = 12; 27.9%) [ 38 ]. The lowest prevalence was documented in a study by Lubogo et al [ 64 ]; 8.4% (31/369) of the participants had been circumcised in a safe male circumcision designated health facility. Factors associated with circumcision included peer support (AOR = 5.88; 95%CI = 1.66–20.00) and perceived procedural safety of circumcision (AOR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.16–21.17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In our quantitative analysis, we summarized continuous variables using mean and standard deviation, and used percentages for the categorical variables. We defined the outcome (uptake of VMMC) as getting circumcised under the VMMC program by a trained medical worker, 6 , 19 which we measured on a binary scale as a proportion. Information on perceptions on VMMC, fears associated with VMMC, and misconceptions about VMMC were assessed using a Likert scale and later collapsed into binary responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from prior studies shows that interventions that offer social spaces that allow men to project non-normative masculine characteristics such as vulnerability and weakness while retaining their social status [15] and those that provide men with an opportunity to discuss HIV-related issues, including HIV testing, with fellow men [16] can improve HIV testing rates among men. However, only a few interventions have targeted men in fishing communities with interventions aimed to improve HIV testing or linkage to HIV care through men-tomen interventions [17,18]. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-led oral HIV self-testing (HIVST) intervention to improve HIV testing and linkage to HIV care among young people (15-24 years) and adult men (25+ years) in Kasensero fishing community along the shores of Lake Victoria in rural Uganda.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%