2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822002000400012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of immunomagnetic separation for detection of Salmonella in raw broiler parts

Abstract: This study was conducted aiming to compare the conventional microbiological method to detect Salmonella in broiler parts with the Immunomagnetic Separation method (IMS) followed by plate isolation and also the IMS associated with Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth (RV). The IMS was performed following a pre-enrichment step in buffered peptone water. Sixty-one samples (raw broiler parts) were tested and the results showed that the use of the IMS method alone allowed the isolation of Salmonella in 9 of the tested sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, Salmonella Enteritidis has been one of the most prevalent serovars isolated in human infections (12) as well as in nonhuman sources, which include broiler carcasses (22), foodstuffs, poultry flocks, environment, sewage, water, animal feed, chiller water, other animals, viscera, stools, unknown sources (24), and raw broilers parts (21 The strains were isolated using the conventional method for detection of Salmonella, recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Supply (9). Briefly, twenty-five grams of skin and muscle, collected under aseptic conditions, were taken from each broiler carcass and homogenized in 225 mL of Bufferd Peptone Water (BPW)(Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany), and incubated at 37ºC for 24h (pre-enrichment).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, Salmonella Enteritidis has been one of the most prevalent serovars isolated in human infections (12) as well as in nonhuman sources, which include broiler carcasses (22), foodstuffs, poultry flocks, environment, sewage, water, animal feed, chiller water, other animals, viscera, stools, unknown sources (24), and raw broilers parts (21 The strains were isolated using the conventional method for detection of Salmonella, recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Supply (9). Briefly, twenty-five grams of skin and muscle, collected under aseptic conditions, were taken from each broiler carcass and homogenized in 225 mL of Bufferd Peptone Water (BPW)(Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany), and incubated at 37ºC for 24h (pre-enrichment).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1, conventional culture and immunomagnetic separation methods helped isolation of Salmonella bacteria in seven samples. According to the formula described in Boer and Beumer [21] , the sensivities of the methods used are found to be as 71.4% for conventional culture method, and 42.8% for IMS. Based on the data and calculations given above, conventional culture method was found to be 28.6% more sensitive than immunomagnetic separation method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-Salmonella paramagnetic beads are anti-Salmonella antibodies that bound covalently bacteria surface. The immunomagnetic separation was accomplished starting from 1 mL the pre-enrichment broth was transferred to an Eppendorf tube containing 20 µL of the immunomagnetic microbeads coated with anti-Salmonella [20,21] . The tubes were shaken on a Dynal® MX3 sample mixer (Dynal®, Norway) at room temperature for 10 min.…”
Section: Immunomagnetic Separation Methods (Ims)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other studies have reported a poor performance of the method that combines IMS with plating on selective agar for Salmonella detection in chicken samples (13,14). The use of different enrichment protocols before IMS can be the cause of such contrasting results, since it is well known that selective agents of enrichment broths and incubation time and temperature are factors that affect decisively the analysis outcome (6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%