2014
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0336-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of ground granulated blast furnace slag as partial cement replacement in lightweight oil palm shell concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees well to the previous finding involving GGBS in OPSC and this could be attributed to the delayed hydration of GGBS [2]. Nevertheless, in terms of environment sustainability, the use of higher amount of GGBS in OPSC is more advantageous since the decrease in compressive strength could be compensated by the significant reduction in carbon dioxide emission due to the use of cement [2]. The mean cylinder to cube compressive strength ratio for the mix C4 which contained 60% GGBS was about 0.70 and thus it could be said that the GGBS content had little influence on the cylinder to cube compressive strength ratio.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This agrees well to the previous finding involving GGBS in OPSC and this could be attributed to the delayed hydration of GGBS [2]. Nevertheless, in terms of environment sustainability, the use of higher amount of GGBS in OPSC is more advantageous since the decrease in compressive strength could be compensated by the significant reduction in carbon dioxide emission due to the use of cement [2]. The mean cylinder to cube compressive strength ratio for the mix C4 which contained 60% GGBS was about 0.70 and thus it could be said that the GGBS content had little influence on the cylinder to cube compressive strength ratio.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to both the cube and cylinder compressive strengths in Table 3, it was found that when the GGBS content was increased in OPSC, the strength was decreased by about 12%. This agrees well to the previous finding involving GGBS in OPSC and this could be attributed to the delayed hydration of GGBS [2]. Nevertheless, in terms of environment sustainability, the use of higher amount of GGBS in OPSC is more advantageous since the decrease in compressive strength could be compensated by the significant reduction in carbon dioxide emission due to the use of cement [2].…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies reported that the substitution of OPC with mineral admixture in structural LWC reduced the density of concrete (Kılıç et al, 2003;Shafigh et al, 2013), which may be attributed to the lower specific gravity of the supplementary cementitious material compared to OPC (Akçaözoğlu and Atiş, 2011;Mo et al, 2014b). In this study, RHA has a lower specific gravity (2.30) than OPC (3.10), and, hence, the replacement of 15% of OPC had a direct influence on the density reduction.…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In the past, it was shown that the production of OPSC required a high amount of cement content up to 550 kg/m 3 (Shafigh et al, 2012;Mo et al, 2014b). Therefore, in this study, to produce high strength LWC, the binder content was fixed at 550 kg/m 3 for all mixes.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 98%