2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2016.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of esterified sago bark fibre waste for removal of oil from palm oil mill effluent

Abstract: With oil and grease content of 4000-8000 mg/l in palm oil mill effluent (POME), the commonly used ponding system often fails to produce treated effluent that meets the minimum standard of treated effluent. The present study investigates the efficiency of sago bark (SB) and esterified sago bark (ESB) for removal of emulsified oil from POME. Oil removal experiments were conducted at different batch experimental conditions: namely adsorbent dosage, contact time, temperature and pH. In overall, the oil removal eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the palm oil factories use conventional ponding systems to treat POME that requires a long treatment period and a large area. Instead of being left in the pond, POME could become an attractive natural source for biodiesel production since the oil concentration in POME ranges between 4000 and 8000 mg/L [143][144][145]. Although those wastes can be efficiently treated by available treatment technologies to meet the standard discharge limits, it also can be used as a cheaper raw material for producing biodiesel together with the importance of highlighting the global sustainability challenges.…”
Section: The Prospect Of Palm Oil By-products and Mill Effluent For Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the palm oil factories use conventional ponding systems to treat POME that requires a long treatment period and a large area. Instead of being left in the pond, POME could become an attractive natural source for biodiesel production since the oil concentration in POME ranges between 4000 and 8000 mg/L [143][144][145]. Although those wastes can be efficiently treated by available treatment technologies to meet the standard discharge limits, it also can be used as a cheaper raw material for producing biodiesel together with the importance of highlighting the global sustainability challenges.…”
Section: The Prospect Of Palm Oil By-products and Mill Effluent For Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these special features, the applications of adsorbents for POME decolourization and polishing have received a lot of attention. On a general overview, adsorbents have recorded a credible performance in decolourization of POME with removal efficiency ranging from 80 to 99.9% and also improves the membrane fouling condition under optimal process conditions [180,181]. Yuniarto et al [18] operated a submerged AerMBR under aeration condition comparing the treatment with and without adsorbents.…”
Section: Aerobic Processes In Mbr (Aermbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to considerable deterioration of pollutants by the adsorbent (AC) prior to the membrane filtration treatment. Hence, the adsorptive process as pretreatment reduces the number of contaminants present in mixed liquor and so relegate pores blockage initiation and the propensity of biofilm formation [18,47,180,181]. However, AC requires chemical treatment, such as the use of buffer solution to vary the pH level [182] for good adsorption during treatment, and this practices often lead to the formation of acidic or basic permeate [183] which is hazardous to the environment if discharged without further treatments.…”
Section: Aerobic Processes In Mbr (Aermbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPW is dominated by parenchyma cells. Meanwhile, SBW is the outer part of a stricter sago stem (Wahi et al 2017) or peripheral parts which are dominated by sclereid cells. The B I OD I V E R S I TA S 20 (12): 3517-3526, December 2019 3518 purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of sago waste, i.e., sago pith waste (SPW) and sago bark waste (SBW).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%