1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(95)08894-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of d0, d1, d2 electron configurations to obtain parameters for transition metals in the molecular mechanics of dioxo- or diimido-tetrahedral complexes (Cr, Mo, Re, Os)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blaine et al applied molecular mechanics to the prediction of geometries MoO 2 (mes) 2 ( 1 ) and several other dioxo- or diimido-tetrahedral transition metal complexes, which exhibit strong valence angle deformations around the metal and for which crystal structures were already known . In this study, missing parameters were designed according to the electron configuration of the metal, thus enabling the prediction of satisfactory geometries.…”
Section: 4 Theoretical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blaine et al applied molecular mechanics to the prediction of geometries MoO 2 (mes) 2 ( 1 ) and several other dioxo- or diimido-tetrahedral transition metal complexes, which exhibit strong valence angle deformations around the metal and for which crystal structures were already known . In this study, missing parameters were designed according to the electron configuration of the metal, thus enabling the prediction of satisfactory geometries.…”
Section: 4 Theoretical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove the stereoselective complexation of Li + with O5 and O6, we investigated the energy difference between the two diastereoisomers 9(R-C7) and 9(S-C7) (scheme 9) using the molecular mechanics software EMO, 14 which uses MM2 parametrization. 15,16 The steric energy was optimized starting from 486 initial conformations, and the resulting steric energy minima for 9(R-C7) and 9(S-C7) were found to be 366.36 kJ and 370.64 kJ, respectively. This small energy difference is too small to be considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%