2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3683-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Anabaena sp. in CO2 removal processes

Abstract: This paper focuses on modelling the growth rate and exopolysaccharides production of Anabaena sp. ATCC 33047, to be used in carbon dioxide removal and biofuels production. For this, the influence of dilution rate, irradiance and aeration rate on the biomass and exopolysaccharides productivity, as well as on the CO(2) fixation rate, have been studied. The productivity of the cultures was maximum at the highest irradiance and dilution rate assayed, resulting to 0.5 g(bio) l(-1) day(-1) and 0.2 g(eps) l(-1) day(-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been increasing focus on the use of microalgal culture technology (MCT) for both bio-fixation of CO 2 from flue gases (Adamczyk et al, 2016;Al Ketife et al, 2017;Almomani et al, 2017;Razzak et al, 2013;Toledo-Cervantes et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2017a;Zhou et al, 2017b) and removal of nutrients from wastewater (AlMomani and Örmeci, 2016;Arbib et al, 2017;Gao et al, 2018;Sutherland et al, 2014;Sutherland et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2017a;Znad et al, 2018a), with the technical and cost implications of the combined process also recently considered (Judd et al, 2017;Kasprzyk and Gajewska, 2019). The use of biology for carbon capture and direct generation of useful products, predominantly biofuel (Bai and Acharya, 2017;de Godos et al, 2014;Fernández et al, 2012;Kassim and Meng, 2017;Singh et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2011), obviates the energy-intensive solvent regeneration step of the conventional absorption process for carbon capture (Hammond and Spargo, 2014;Wang et al, 2017;Wilberforce et al, 2019). Moreover, the removal of nutrients from wastewater is considered an essential requirement for the approval of treatment facilities (Almomani et al, 2014;Nourmohammadi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been increasing focus on the use of microalgal culture technology (MCT) for both bio-fixation of CO 2 from flue gases (Adamczyk et al, 2016;Al Ketife et al, 2017;Almomani et al, 2017;Razzak et al, 2013;Toledo-Cervantes et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2017a;Zhou et al, 2017b) and removal of nutrients from wastewater (AlMomani and Örmeci, 2016;Arbib et al, 2017;Gao et al, 2018;Sutherland et al, 2014;Sutherland et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2017a;Znad et al, 2018a), with the technical and cost implications of the combined process also recently considered (Judd et al, 2017;Kasprzyk and Gajewska, 2019). The use of biology for carbon capture and direct generation of useful products, predominantly biofuel (Bai and Acharya, 2017;de Godos et al, 2014;Fernández et al, 2012;Kassim and Meng, 2017;Singh et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2011), obviates the energy-intensive solvent regeneration step of the conventional absorption process for carbon capture (Hammond and Spargo, 2014;Wang et al, 2017;Wilberforce et al, 2019). Moreover, the removal of nutrients from wastewater is considered an essential requirement for the approval of treatment facilities (Almomani et al, 2014;Nourmohammadi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, using Anabaena up to 1.0 g/L•day of captured CO 2 was obtained at laboratory scale, it being mainly accumulated at released exopolysaccharides. 55 In terms of photosynthetic efficiency (PE, Eq. ( 5)) an analogous trend is observed because the light provided was the same for all the experiments and the light utilization is proportional to the biomass productivity (Fig.…”
Section: Biomass Production and Photosynthetic Efficiency By Microalgae And Strain Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to capture CO2 from the flue gas with a CO2 concentration 400 times higher than that of the atmosphere, Botryococcus braunii (Ruangsomboon et al, 2017), Chlorella vulgaris (Pires et al, 2014), Anabaena sp. (Fernández et al, 2012), and Chlorella sp. (Zhao et al, 2011) have been investigated, which CO2 fixation rates can reach 3.05 g CO2 L -1 d -1 .…”
Section: Co2 Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 98%