2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02894.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities in 39 low‐income countries

Abstract: The results support continued efforts by the governments to engage strategically with the private sector. However, they also highlight the importance of not generalizing conditions across countries. Governments may need to reconsider simplistic user-fee abolition strategies at public providers if they simply focus on consultation fees. Policies to make health services more accessible need to consider a comprehensive benefit package that includes a wider scope of costs related to care such as expenditures on me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
94
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
94
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we found in the decile analysis, that the decile representing the wealthier families is the one who spends more money on private health insurance, which is an exclusive benefit of the higher deciles to 3rd. This data agree with the OMS meta-analysis, which reported that the wealthier quintile spends more money on private health services than quintile 1 (Saksena et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we found in the decile analysis, that the decile representing the wealthier families is the one who spends more money on private health insurance, which is an exclusive benefit of the higher deciles to 3rd. This data agree with the OMS meta-analysis, which reported that the wealthier quintile spends more money on private health services than quintile 1 (Saksena et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Accordingly, in a meta-analysis from 39 low and middle income countries, expenditure on medicines represents the major component (57%) of the out-of-pocket spending as well (Saksena et al, 2012). Furthermore, we found in the decile analysis, that the decile representing the wealthier families is the one who spends more money on private health insurance, which is an exclusive benefit of the higher deciles to 3rd.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…20 Unqualified practitioner do not charge visiting fees, and they are abundant in rural communities, minimizing transportation costs and wage loss. [21][22][23] However, since they often run their own drug shops, they may prescribe a greater quantity of drugs compared with qualified health-care practitioners, [24][25][26] increasing overall cost per episode of illness, suggested by analysis of medicine costs in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] Similar findings were also reported by the data from 2007 survey of the California Health Foundation. [16,17] This could be most probably ascribed to the lower dental service utilization among the occupiers of the developing countries due to the accessibility barriers and lack of consciousness among the people. [18] The assessment of expenditure on individual components highlighted the fact that the highest mean monthly expenditure was on the medical and dental consultation/treatment followed by the expenditure on the medications.…”
Section: World Journal Of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%