2015
DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000000345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Wood's Light in Margin Determination of Melanoma In Situ After Excisional Biopsy

Abstract: Wood's light examination has limited utility if complete excisional biopsy of MIS is performed before treatment. In this study, surgical margin based on the Wood's light examination would have resulted in an increased average wound size and would not have reduced the number of stages needed when performing the square procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome variation in margin estimation due to wound retraction after electrocoagulation, specimen shrinkage after formalin fixation, 29 or inaccuracy in the digital margin calculation, we performed 2 methods of image calibration, margin estimation, and videomosaic quadrant size estimation, which have not been described in previous studies assessing the LM/LMM margins. 7,8,14,15 However, further studies involving multiple readers with varying levels of experience are needed to validate these results, since our study included only two confocalists who acquired data and one who analyzed the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome variation in margin estimation due to wound retraction after electrocoagulation, specimen shrinkage after formalin fixation, 29 or inaccuracy in the digital margin calculation, we performed 2 methods of image calibration, margin estimation, and videomosaic quadrant size estimation, which have not been described in previous studies assessing the LM/LMM margins. 7,8,14,15 However, further studies involving multiple readers with varying levels of experience are needed to validate these results, since our study included only two confocalists who acquired data and one who analyzed the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Wood's light examination has been demonstrated to be useful for margin assessment of melanoma in situ (MIS) before biopsy, 29 and is particularly useful in determining margins of LM/LMM before surgical excision. 30,31 However, Walsh et al 30 prospectively studied the accuracy of preoperative Wood's light examination for margin assessment of MIS after excisional biopsy. They concluded that it is not reliable to assess subclinical disease with Wood's light in these patients since many false positive and false negatives can occur.…”
Section: Wood's Lampmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature states that the surgical borders of LMM can be determined more easily using Wood's light since there is a rise in epidermal melanin in the lesions. Wood's light, on the other hand, was found to detect lesions that could not be seen by the naked eye in just 11.7% of cases in a prospective study [ 45 , 46 ]. Walsh et al [ 46 ] investigated the precision of preoperative Wood's light test for melanoma in situ margin assessment after excisional biopsy in a prospective study.…”
Section: Noninvasive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood's light, on the other hand, was found to detect lesions that could not be seen by the naked eye in just 11.7% of cases in a prospective study [ 45 , 46 ]. Walsh et al [ 46 ] investigated the precision of preoperative Wood's light test for melanoma in situ margin assessment after excisional biopsy in a prospective study. They concluded that using Wood's light to evaluate subclinical disease in these patients is ineffective due to the high rate of false positives and negatives.…”
Section: Noninvasive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%