Utility of Vital Signs, Heart Rate Variability and Complexity, and Machine Learning for Identifying the Need for Lifesaving Interventions in Trauma Patients

Abstract

To date, no studies have attempted to utilize data from a combination of vital signs, heart rate variability and complexity (HRV, HRC), as well as machine learning (ML), for identifying the need for lifesaving interventions (LSIs) in trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to examine the utility of the above for identifying LSI needs and compare different LSI-associated models, with the hypothesis that an ML model would be superior in performance over multivariate logistic regression models. One hundred four patients transported from the injury scene via helicopter were selected for the study. A wireless vital signs monitor was attached to the patient's arm and used to capture physiologic data, including HRV and HRC. The power of vital sign measurements, HRV, HRC, and Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) to identify patients requiring LSIs was estimated using multivariate logistic regression and ML. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also obtained. Thirty-two patients underwent 75 LSIs. After logistic regression, ROC curves demonstrated better identification for LSIs using heart rate (HR) and HRC (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.81) than using HR alone (AUC of 0.73). Likewise, ROC curves demonstrated better identification for LSIs using GCS and HRC (AUC of 0.94) than using GCS and HR (AUC of 0.92). Importantly, ROC curves demonstrated that an ML model using HR, GCS, and HRC (AUC of 0.99) had superior performance over multivariate logistic regression models for identifying the need for LSIs in trauma patients. Development of computer decision support systems should utilize vital signs, HRC, and ML in order to achieve more accurate diagnostic capabilities, such as identification of needs for LSIs in trauma patients.

A Comparison of a Machine Learning Model with EuroSCORE II in Predicting Mortality after Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Decision Curve Analysis

“…This study found the ML model to be superior to traditional logistic regression, which has already been observed in many studies [9–13]. For example, in the study of Churpek and al ., machine learning and logistic regression were compared to predict clinical deterioration in a large multicentric database of 269,999 patients.…”

“…Machine learning can establish powerful predictive models, and is already used by major companies such as Google and Facebook. Several studies have shown the superiority of machine learning over traditional logistic regression used in EuroSCORE II [9–13]. …”

Quantitative forecasting of PTSD from early trauma responses: A Machine Learning application

“…However, the findings in the current study should be tested for their accuracy to forecast as well as classify posttraumatic stress outcomes. ML classification algorithms have also been used to forecast the need for life-saving interventions among trauma patients based on vital signs and heart-rate while in transport to the hospital with very high accuracy (Liu, Holcomb, Wade, Darrah, & Salinas, 2014). This provides a useful example of how such methods can be used for efficient and accurate clinical decision-making.…”

Comparison of Decision-Assist and Clinical Judgment of Experts for Prediction of Lifesaving Interventions

“…The Murphy Factor did not discriminate which of the six LSIs, one of which was blood transfusion, was indicated (21). In 96 prehospital trauma patients of whom 50% had any of six LSIs, a Murphy Factor more than 3 had AUROC of 0.62 for prediction of any LSI.…”