2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0904-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of the optical quality analysis system for decision-making in cataract surgery

Abstract: BackgroundA cataract is a common cause of vision impairment that requires surgery in older subjects. The Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS, Visiometrics SL, Terrassa, Spain) assesses the optical quality of the eye in cataract patients. This study shows the role of the optical quality evaluation system for decision-making in cataract surgery. We investigated the clinical utility of the OQAS for decision-making in cataract surgery.MethodsSixty-seven eyes from 67 patients undergoing cataract surgery and 109 e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is, therefore, more closely related to the OSI, given that it assesses one of the direct consequences of increased scattered light in the eye media [36]. Thus, the OSI provides a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing cataracts [37,38], proving to be the most effective optical quality parameter for use in decision-making in cataract surgery [39]. Moreover, it has been proposed as a way of validating a patient's visual complaints, providing an objective quantification of the visual degradation that actually affects tasks necessary to maintain a good quality of life, such as driving [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, more closely related to the OSI, given that it assesses one of the direct consequences of increased scattered light in the eye media [36]. Thus, the OSI provides a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing cataracts [37,38], proving to be the most effective optical quality parameter for use in decision-making in cataract surgery [39]. Moreover, it has been proposed as a way of validating a patient's visual complaints, providing an objective quantification of the visual degradation that actually affects tasks necessary to maintain a good quality of life, such as driving [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical quality after cataract surgery gained more and more attention for providing satisfactory visual outcomes [20,21]. Studies have shown that FLACS produce better clear corneal incision morphology [8], more precise reproducible capsulotomies [9][10][11][12][13], and better IOL centration [11] when compared with conventional PCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our population sample was representative of general French population who undergo cataract surgery [4]. Even if BCVA may be less considered now, as the latest recommendations not include it in surgery decision-making, our mean BCVA respected the previous cutoff established by the competent Health Authorities, like Hwang et al [53], or contrary to some studies evaluating the OQAS on patients with lower preoperative logMAR BCVA at earlier stages agerelated cataract [21,49,50,[54][55][56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Previous studies on the OQAS showed no consensus on population selection: most authors chose to include cataracts with different components (N/C/P) [49,50,53,55,56,59], but one selected only nuclear cataracts [21]. As cortical components cause disability in daily life without necessarily greatly impairing visual acuity [57,62], we chose to consider every type of cataract (N/C/P) for both population selection and LOCS III grading, to prevent potential bias: Artal et al [40] did not consider this point in selecting their population, and mentioned it as a limitation.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%