1996
DOI: 10.1159/000333996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of the Cervical Cytologic Smear in Assessing Endocervical Involvement by Endometrial Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies since 1970 have focused predominantly on the potential role of cervical cytology as a predictor of grade, stage, or other clinical parameters (Table 4). 3,18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The sensitivities of those studies range from 20% to 90%. Many report higher sensitivity than we found in the current study; however, in most instances, this well may have resulted from a review of Pap tests by cytologists who were aware of the underlying malignancy, with a concomitant change in the perception of abnormal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies since 1970 have focused predominantly on the potential role of cervical cytology as a predictor of grade, stage, or other clinical parameters (Table 4). 3,18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The sensitivities of those studies range from 20% to 90%. Many report higher sensitivity than we found in the current study; however, in most instances, this well may have resulted from a review of Pap tests by cytologists who were aware of the underlying malignancy, with a concomitant change in the perception of abnormal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many report higher sensitivity than we found in the current study; however, in most instances, this well may have resulted from a review of Pap tests by cytologists who were aware of the underlying malignancy, with a concomitant change in the perception of abnormal. 3,24,26,27,29,32 Comparisons between those studies also are hampered by significant differences in the classification of Pap tests, including a lack of consensus about whether benign-appearing endometrial cells constitute normal or abnormal findings. In addition, differentiating between benign, atypical, and malignant endometrial cells in Pap tests may be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 More commonly a carcinomatous lesion, such as poorly differentiated carcinoma of either the cervix or endometrium, would be expected rather than PNET in a smear. 42 These tumors are aggressive, with small, anaplastic cells with hyperchromatic nuclei, scant cytoplasm and finely to coarsely granular chromatin. 13,26 PNET cells are more diffuse and uniform in appearance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 25% of the malignancies, adenocarcinoma cells were present (Pap V), which is within the range of 15-50% reported in the literature. 9,10,12,13,[21][22][23][24][25][26] We compared the Pap classification and the CISOE-A classification. A hypothetical advantage of the CISOE-A classification is that women with abnormal sqaumous cells can be differentiated from women with other abnormal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%