2005
DOI: 10.1300/j020v23n01_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) at an Alcohol Detoxification Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant to the current study, psychiatric symptoms among drug users are widespread and often ignored despite research that gives evidence to the improved treatment process and outcomes of individuals who are correctly and comorbidly diagnosed (Cornelius, Bukstein, Salloum, & Clark, 2003;Cornelius et al, 1995;De Bernado, Newcomb, Toth, Richey, & Mendoza, 2002;Drake & Wallach, 2000). Use of psychiatric screening instruments is thus becoming increasingly common in substance abuse treatment settings, and the psychometric validation of such tools with these populations must be established (Johnson, Brems, Freemon, & Mills, 2005). The current study seeks to confirm the factor structure of the BDI-II with drug users to establish the appropriate interpretation of test results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Relevant to the current study, psychiatric symptoms among drug users are widespread and often ignored despite research that gives evidence to the improved treatment process and outcomes of individuals who are correctly and comorbidly diagnosed (Cornelius, Bukstein, Salloum, & Clark, 2003;Cornelius et al, 1995;De Bernado, Newcomb, Toth, Richey, & Mendoza, 2002;Drake & Wallach, 2000). Use of psychiatric screening instruments is thus becoming increasingly common in substance abuse treatment settings, and the psychometric validation of such tools with these populations must be established (Johnson, Brems, Freemon, & Mills, 2005). The current study seeks to confirm the factor structure of the BDI-II with drug users to establish the appropriate interpretation of test results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%