Utility of Routine Admission Serum Chemistry Panels in Adult Trauma Patients

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the frequency of abnormal serum chemistries and whether they provide clinically useful information regarding trauma patients. To identify clinical criteria associated with critical serum chemistry values (CSCVs). Methods:The records of all trauma patients admitted to one urban, Level I Trauma Center were retrospectively reviewed for the period (July 1-December 31,1989). All trauma patients who had had serum chemistry determinations at hospital admission and at least once more prior to discharge were studied. The CSCVs were determined by a panel of experts prior to record review. Serum chemistry values, patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, and outcomes were statistically analyzed.Results: Most (814/913; 89%) trauma patients had abnormal serum chemistry values. However, only 54/913 (6%) had CSCVs and only six of these CSCVs had prompted a change in resuscitation or treatment (therapeutic K + infusions). Age > 50 years, a history of hypertension therapy, and a Glasgow Coma Scale score 5 10 were associated with CSCVs; and CSCVs were correlated with increased mortality and critical care unit admission. Conclusion:Routine-admission serum chemistry values, while frequently abnormal for major trauma patients, generally do not provide clinically useful information in the resuscitation and treatment of trauma patients. Hypoglycemia and metabolic acidosis were more rapidly determined using bedside glucose determination and arterial blood gas evaluation. The routine-admission serum chemistry panel described in the study lacked utility for most trauma patients. Selective chemistry panel ordering should be used at the time of hospital admission for major trauma patients.Acad. Emerg. Med. 1995; 2:190-194.

Reining in Unnecessary Admission EKGs: A Successful Interdepartmental High-Value Care Initiative

“…These studies are often ordered according to hospital policy or on the admitting provider's belief. Each admitted patient needs a common set of routine admission studies (e.g., complete blood count, chemistry panel [2], and chest X-ray (CXR)) [3]. Likewise, "admission electrocardiograms (EKGs)" are routinely ordered on patients without indications.…”

Precision, Accuracy, and Managed Care Implications of a Hand-Held Whole Blood Analyzer in the Prehospital Setting

“…We did not believe it was necessary to perform standard in-hospital laboratory testing to validate the iSTAT results because such validation has already been performed (ie, the de-vice is FDA approved and extensive data validating the iSTAT against standard in-hospital laboratory correlation is already in the literature). 9 A limitation of the instrument is the narrow temperature range for operation (64 °F-86 °F). Such temperatures are rarely achieved in the field.…”

Bringing value, balance and humanity to the emergency department: The Right Care Top 10 for emergency medicine

“…Individual laboratory tests should be performed when there is clinical suspicion of a specific medical illness and the test is likely to contribute to a change in treatment plan. There is abundant evidence that routine use of many different types of laboratory tests, for a large variety of ED patients, has low utility and is not cost effective 32–48. Reflexive ordering of ‘routine labs’ incurs significant cost and, more importantly, potential harm due to downstream testing, without evidence that it improves patient outcomes.…”