2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01526-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of PSA doubling time in follow-up of untreated patients with localized prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 One observation study concluded that PSA DT correlated with disease progression. 25 However, these studies had short follow up and were unable to M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12 determine the correlation with cancer metastasis or progression. PSA kinetics lack specificity due to the confounding effects of PSA lability and inflammation causing a sharp rise in PSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 One observation study concluded that PSA DT correlated with disease progression. 25 However, these studies had short follow up and were unable to M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12 determine the correlation with cancer metastasis or progression. PSA kinetics lack specificity due to the confounding effects of PSA lability and inflammation causing a sharp rise in PSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Triggers for definitive therapy that vary by protocol and by individual include PSA doubling time less than 3 years, 16 grade progression on repeat biopsy 4 and stage progression on digital rectal examination. 17 However, in men with low risk disease an initial delay in therapy was reported to have minimal impact on curability 18 or the risk of biochemical progression. 19 Of the more than 1,300 men currently enrolled in published AS cohorts 8 only 2 were reported to have died of prostate cancer, of whom each underwent early therapy with PSA kinetics, suggestive of aggressive disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][12][13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22]29,32,33 The studies reporting their active surveillance protocol conducted multicore (6-to 17-core) biopsies every 1 to 2 years. 5,10,12,[15][16][17][18]21,23,[28][29][30][33][34][35] Five studies conducted multicore biopsies every 2 to 4 years. 8,11,13,19,32 Regarding Multiparametric MRI, it has been shown to be a good predictor of disease reclassification.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%