2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of photography for trachoma surveys: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using photography to grade eyelids for trachoma have shown reasonably good correlation with field grading. 4 , 7 9 However, some studies have had difficulties with high rates of ungradable images from 11% to 78%. 5 , 9 , 10 Commonly reported factors contributing to images being ungradable included improper focus on the grading area, inadequate coverage of the grading area, excess light reflection, or shadows obscuring the grading area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies using photography to grade eyelids for trachoma have shown reasonably good correlation with field grading. 4 , 7 9 However, some studies have had difficulties with high rates of ungradable images from 11% to 78%. 5 , 9 , 10 Commonly reported factors contributing to images being ungradable included improper focus on the grading area, inadequate coverage of the grading area, excess light reflection, or shadows obscuring the grading area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument that TI cannot be graded reliably, at least for images, was not the case in this study, and agreement on grading TI in the field has also reportedly been very good. 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While photography has often been used as part of randomized controlled trials and in trachoma research generally, data are scarce on the reliability of conjunctival photography within various programmatic surveys. 6 The photographer in this study traveled house-to-house alongside field graders and achieved a high response rate. Within the 10 selected communities, which were scattered across a large geographic area, the team photographed nearly all participants examined for a field grade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the precision of TF grading becomes problematic when trachoma prevalence is low. There is tendency to overcall follicles [ 3 ], and there is clearly intergrader variability even when agreement is acceptable [ 4 ]. At the same time, a test of infection for surveillance purposes is also controversial as sensitive commercial tests are expensive, there are no guidelines or standardization on usage, and evidence shows that a low level of infection does not necessarily lead to trachoma re-emergence [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%