1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70322-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of minor ultrasonographic markers in the prediction of abnormal fetal karyotype at a prenatal diagnostic center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, a single marker is observed in more than 11% of normal fetuses compared with 22.6% of fetuses with trisomy 21. Similarly, Sohl et al 38 observed a single marker in 14.6% of normal fetuses. On the basis of these data, a single marker increases the risk 2-fold; 2 markers increase the risk nearly 10-fold; and 3 or more markers increase the risk more than 100-fold.…”
Section: Markersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In comparison, a single marker is observed in more than 11% of normal fetuses compared with 22.6% of fetuses with trisomy 21. Similarly, Sohl et al 38 observed a single marker in 14.6% of normal fetuses. On the basis of these data, a single marker increases the risk 2-fold; 2 markers increase the risk nearly 10-fold; and 3 or more markers increase the risk more than 100-fold.…”
Section: Markersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, in most aneuploid gestations, SUA will be observed on ultrasound in association with other structural anomalies. The relative risk for aneuploidy was calculated to be 9.4 when SUA was an isolated finding, increasing to 16.4 if other minor sonographic markers were also detected 11 . Isolated SUA should apparently not be considered as an indication for prenatal evaluation of fetal chromosomes 12 .…”
Section: Single Umbilical Arterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Separation of the choroid from the medial ventricular wall by 3 mm or greater ( Figure 2) has been associated with an abnormal outcome. [5][6][7] Prior studies on this finding have shown an association with trisomy 21 and developmental problems. These studies, however, have not detailed the natural history of choroid plexus separation or completely excluded cases with other sonographic findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%