2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of minor determinants for skin testing in inpatient penicillin allergy evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another concern for this study was the fact that we designed cHBIs to target only the well-known major determinant of the penicillin allergy while not taking minor allergy determinants into account. Although literature reports have shown skin prick test reactions to minor penicillin allergy determinants, our results established that a single cHBI can still be effective in mice (27). We believe this is due to the high degree of homology between the major penicillin determinant, penicilloyl, and minor determinants such as penicilloate and penilloate and the high cross-reactivity between b-lactam antibiotics (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Another concern for this study was the fact that we designed cHBIs to target only the well-known major determinant of the penicillin allergy while not taking minor allergy determinants into account. Although literature reports have shown skin prick test reactions to minor penicillin allergy determinants, our results established that a single cHBI can still be effective in mice (27). We believe this is due to the high degree of homology between the major penicillin determinant, penicilloyl, and minor determinants such as penicilloate and penilloate and the high cross-reactivity between b-lactam antibiotics (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Another large US study of inpatient penicillin-allergy skin testing (with 90% performed by a nurse) found a much higher rate (20%) of positive skin tests, but utilised minor determinant skin tests with different criteria for a positive skin test. 55 Another study utilised telemedicine to reduce the need for on-site allergy specialists, with skin testing performed by physician assistants. 56 Some studies have performed penicillin-allergy testing in the emergency department; however, higher than typical rates of positive skin tests (15.5%) might suggest that the 30 min training session for testers was inadequate.…”
Section: Inpatient-based Penicillin Skin Testing Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Dellen and Gleich, 1970 25 Sullivan et al, 1981 26 Romano et al, 1995 27 Romano et al, 1997 28 31 Sogn et al, 1992 32 PPL+ benzylpenicillin + benzylpenicilloate + benzylpenilloate Adkinson, Jr., et al, 1971 33 Chandra et al, 1980 34 Mendelson et al, 1984 35 Gadde et al, 1993 36 Pichichero and Pichichero, 1998 37 Klaustermeyer and Gowda, 2005 38 Treudler et al, 2007 39 Frigas et al, 2008 40 Nolan et al, 2008 41 Raja et al, 2009 42 PPL + benzylpenicillin + benzylpenicilloate + benzylpenilloate + amoxicillin Macy et al, 1997 43 Macy et al, 2010 44 Lin et al, 2010 45 Kopac et al, 2012 46 Geng et al, 2017 47 Marwood et al, 2017 48 51 Matheu et al, 2007 52 Romano et al, 2007 53 Romano et al, 2009 54 Romano et al, 2010 55 Richter et al, 2011 56 Al-Ahmad et al, 2014 57 Bourke et al, 2015 58 Abbreviations: MDM, minor determinant mixture; PPL, penicilloyl-polylysine.…”
Section: Ppl+ Benzylpenicillin + Benzylpenicilloate + Ampicillin + Other Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70,71 The safety of penicillin skin testing was assessed in a review of 54 studies published over a period of 49 years. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][24][25][26]30,[32][33][34][36][37][38][39][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]...…”
Section: Sensitivity and Safety Of Penicillin Skin Test Evaluations In History-positive Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%