2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-010-9871-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Free-Breathing, Whole-Heart, Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Coronary Anatomy for Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract: The incidence of coronary anomalies is increased in congenital heart disease (CHD). Whole-heart magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as a robust approach to coronary artery imaging without ionizing radiation. The proximal coronary arteries were imaged in 112 CHD patients (63 males) age 17 ± 13 years (range 11 days-68 years) using a navigator-gated, whole-heart, three-dimensional (3D) technique at 1.5 T. Two observers assessed image quality overall and for left anterior descending coronary artery … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown reliable visualization of proximal coronary artery segments in pediatric patients, but scan quality has been shown to be inversely related to the age and heart rate of the patient, and the MRI coronary scans did not allow definition of stenosis or distal coronary artery segments. [22][23][24] In our experience, we have also had difficulty visualizing distal coronary artery segments, particularly in small children and in postoperative patients with metallic clips, stents, and devices. MRI has no ionizing radiation exposure but a longer scan time and lower spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several studies have shown reliable visualization of proximal coronary artery segments in pediatric patients, but scan quality has been shown to be inversely related to the age and heart rate of the patient, and the MRI coronary scans did not allow definition of stenosis or distal coronary artery segments. [22][23][24] In our experience, we have also had difficulty visualizing distal coronary artery segments, particularly in small children and in postoperative patients with metallic clips, stents, and devices. MRI has no ionizing radiation exposure but a longer scan time and lower spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These data can be used during the scan to plan image planes for further scanning, as well as during the . . reporting phase to assess 3D relationships between structures, quantify vessel size, and view morphology (23)(24)(25)(26). † Velocity encoded phase contrast imaging (PC-CMR) is an accurate, robust, and safe technique for obtaining in-vivo blood flow information in major vessels.…”
Section: Gradient Echo Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). 40,41 Coronary MR imaging is superior to invasive coronary angiography for delineating the course of anomalous vessels. [42][43][44] Anecdotal reports suggest that coronary MR can be used as part of a multisequence MR protocol to evaluate the functional and clinical signif icance of coronary artery anomalies.…”
Section: Coronary Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%