2002
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Flexion and Extension Radiographs of the Cervical Spine in the Acute Evaluation of Blunt Trauma

Abstract: When adequate motion was present on flexion and extension radiographs, the false-negative rate was zero in this study. However, in the acute setting, 30% of the examinations were limited by inadequate motion. A higher percentage of injury (12.5%) was detected by subsequent cross-sectional imaging in these patients. Limited flexion and extension motion on physical examination should preclude the use of flexion and extension radiographs, as they are of limited diagnostic utility. Cross-sectional imaging may be w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Two previous studies specifically address the utility of flexion extension films in awake, alert patients in the trauma setting. Insko et al [14] evaluated 106 patients and found that 30 % of patients had inadequate motion to make the examination significant or useful. The authors found that in those with adequate studies, F/E had a low false negative rate for ligamentous injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two previous studies specifically address the utility of flexion extension films in awake, alert patients in the trauma setting. Insko et al [14] evaluated 106 patients and found that 30 % of patients had inadequate motion to make the examination significant or useful. The authors found that in those with adequate studies, F/E had a low false negative rate for ligamentous injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequacy of F/E was defined as adequate visualization of the cervico-thoracic junction and at least 30°of motion from neutral [12,14]. Eighty percent of the F/E conducted in a 3-year period at our institution did not meet these criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although flexion/extension radiography is useful in the gauging of potential cervical spine instability, it can be difficult to perform in the setting of cervical spine trauma and has been shown to have low usefulness in the evaluation of potential diskoligamentous injury. [21][22][23][24][25] Normative data have been published regarding the upper limits of acceptable prevertebral soft tissue thickness on CT scan, 26 and spinous process widening on plain film 27 ; however, neither normative data regarding disk widening nor objective criteria for evaluation of potential ADL disruption have been published. Therefore, when evaluating the ADL on CT scan, radiologists are forced to rely on a subjective assessment of disk widening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,38 Although there is no official consensus in recently published guidelines, many authors consider MRI to be the gold standard for detecting cervical spine injuries. 13,24 Studies have shown flexion/extension radiographs to be suboptimal in the evaluation of obtunded trauma patients, 1,16 and current guidelines emphasize the use of MRI rather than dynamic radiographs in these patients. [32][33][34][35] It is our current practice to use MRI rather than flexion/extension radiographs in all patients in whom ligamentous injury is suspected.…”
Section: 42mentioning
confidence: 99%