2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00971.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Exit Block for Identifying Electrical Isolation of the Pulmonary Veins

Abstract: Identification of exit block after ostial PV ablation provides a clear endpoint for electrical isolation of the PVs. Isolation of the PVs can be performed during sustained AF without the need to apply excess RF lesions. Applying a 20-minute waiting period after electrical isolation will identify reconnection in approximately 10% of PVs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
122
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
2
122
3
Order By: Relevance
“…141,142,143 Mechanistically, the most likely explanation is source–sink mismatch, which is defined as delay or block of conduction observed when the size of a given excited region supplying depolarizing current (the current source) is insufficient for the amount of depolarizing current necessary to excite the regions ahead (the current sink). 479 Although an initial report has observed unidirectional entrance block in more than 40% of PVs, 445 the incidence was much lower in more recent studies (1.5%–16%). 477,479,480,481 Interestingly, in one of these studies, the presence of PV discharges conducted to the LA (exit conduction) was followed by recovery of entrance conduction during a 30-minute waiting period.…”
Section: Section 5: Strategies Techniques and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…141,142,143 Mechanistically, the most likely explanation is source–sink mismatch, which is defined as delay or block of conduction observed when the size of a given excited region supplying depolarizing current (the current source) is insufficient for the amount of depolarizing current necessary to excite the regions ahead (the current sink). 479 Although an initial report has observed unidirectional entrance block in more than 40% of PVs, 445 the incidence was much lower in more recent studies (1.5%–16%). 477,479,480,481 Interestingly, in one of these studies, the presence of PV discharges conducted to the LA (exit conduction) was followed by recovery of entrance conduction during a 30-minute waiting period.…”
Section: Section 5: Strategies Techniques and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…443 The endpoint for this procedure was either amplitude reduction within the ablated area, 244,437 elimination (or dissociation) of the PV potentials recorded from either one or two circular mapping catheters, or a basket catheter within the ipsilateral PVs 435,438,439,441,442,444 and/or exit block from the PV. 445 …”
Section: Section 5: Strategies Techniques and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ablation was performed segmentally, with isolation of those segments of the PV that demonstrated entry or exit of PV signals. Isolation was confirmed by loss of all high-frequency electrical signals on the circular mapping catheter and loss of atrial capture pacing from all overlapping bipoles of the circular mapping catheter at 10-mA, 2-ms pulse width (exit block 14 ). All PVs were revisited after at least a 20-minute waiting period, and PVs with evidence of recurrent conduction were reisolated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After elimination of PV muscle conduction distal to the ablation site(s), indicated either by the abolition or dissociation of distal PVPs, the absence of conduction from the PV to LA was also confirmed by pacing inside the PV by the mapping catheter or the Lasso catheter during SR. 11,12 After electrical disconnection of the targeted PVs, provocative maneuvers (isoproterenol and burst pacing) were performed to reveal other remaining foci in the ostium proximal to the ablation sites or in other atrial tissues. Additional RF ablation was performed, targeting these remaining foci if necessary.…”
Section: Ablation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%