2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00740.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of corneal confocal microscopy for assessing mild diabetic neuropathy: baseline findings of the LANDMark study

Abstract: Background: For those in the field of managing diabetic complications, the accurate diagnosis and monitoring of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) continues to be a challenge. Assessment of sub-basal corneal nerve morphology has recently shown promise as a novel ophthalmic marker for the detection of DPN. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one individuals with diabetes with predominantly mild or no neuropathy and 61 controls underwent evaluation of diabetic neuropathy symptom score, neuropathy disability score,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
84
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
84
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, several CCM measures correlated with IENFD and with median and ulnar motor and sensory NCV, as well as sural SNAP, in the entire study population, but the relationship was modest to moderate. This is in line with the aforementioned studies (12,32,34) supporting the notion that the pathophysiology underlying the manifestation of neuropathy in the cornea may be different from DSPN affecting the lower limbs. Indeed, vascular factors including reduced endoneurial blood flow and microvascular alterations appear to contribute to the pathogenesis of DSPN (35,36), whereas the normal cornea, albeit being the most densely innervated tissue in the human body (several 100-fold higher than skin) (37), is devoid of blood vessels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the current study, several CCM measures correlated with IENFD and with median and ulnar motor and sensory NCV, as well as sural SNAP, in the entire study population, but the relationship was modest to moderate. This is in line with the aforementioned studies (12,32,34) supporting the notion that the pathophysiology underlying the manifestation of neuropathy in the cornea may be different from DSPN affecting the lower limbs. Indeed, vascular factors including reduced endoneurial blood flow and microvascular alterations appear to contribute to the pathogenesis of DSPN (35,36), whereas the normal cornea, albeit being the most densely innervated tissue in the human body (several 100-fold higher than skin) (37), is devoid of blood vessels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results are cross-sectional and ongoing longitudinal studies 38 will determine the ability of IVCCM to predict the development and progression or regression of DSPN. Recent data generated from wide-field assessment of the subbasal plexus have suggested that both central and inferior whorl nerve density may be reduced early and therefore future studies should explore this further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of the SNP using CCM as a noninvasive and reiterative modality has been shown to be a promising marker for the detection and stratification of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in several studies over the past decade. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Because of the convenience and ease of imaging from the central cornea, this region has been the main focus in almost all of these studies. However, recent investigations in diabetic patients 4 and animals 12 have provided evidence of more pronounced and earlier corneal neural loss at the inferior whorl.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%