2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Biomarkers for Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Staging

Abstract: IMPORTANCEThe 23rd Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI-23) consensus conference proposed a framework to integrate biomarkers into the staging of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unknown whether tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2) and insulinlike growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) could be used for staging. OBJECTIVETo test whether higher levels of urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] are associated with lower survival among patients with the same functional stage of AKI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PART… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, stage 1S ('subclinical AKI'), could be defined by biomarker-positive evidence of kidney injury that does not meet the KDIGO criteria (that is, AKI stage 1 defined by creatinine and urine output criteria are not achieved). Data from the Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) cohort reported in 2022, demonstrate that, for a given stage of KDIGO-defined AKI, higher biomarker values (stages 1B, 2B and 3B) were associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality than stages 1A, 2A and 3A 105 . However, 30-day survival did not differ between biomarker-positive (stage 1S) and biomarker-negative cases in the absence of KDIGO AKI criteria.…”
Section: Measures For Sa-aki Prediction and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, stage 1S ('subclinical AKI'), could be defined by biomarker-positive evidence of kidney injury that does not meet the KDIGO criteria (that is, AKI stage 1 defined by creatinine and urine output criteria are not achieved). Data from the Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) cohort reported in 2022, demonstrate that, for a given stage of KDIGO-defined AKI, higher biomarker values (stages 1B, 2B and 3B) were associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality than stages 1A, 2A and 3A 105 . However, 30-day survival did not differ between biomarker-positive (stage 1S) and biomarker-negative cases in the absence of KDIGO AKI criteria.…”
Section: Measures For Sa-aki Prediction and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original ProCESS trial failed to show a difference in patient outcomes with regard to its primary endpoint of 90-day mortality although there were some differences in fluid balance and AKI event rates across the 3 arms. In a post hoc analyses of a subset of ProCESS patients, the authors sought to assess how TIMP2*IGFBP7 biomarker levels changed before and after the initial 6-h resuscitation protocol and examined how these TIMP2*IGFBP7 changes were associated with patient outcomes (AKI and mortality) [20].…”
Section: Aki Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, as above, a TIMP2*IGFBP7 level above 0.30 constituted a biomarker-positive AKI state. In those with stage 1 only, 15% of patients were biomarker positive; this increased to 27% and 34.4% in stages 2 and 3 AKI, respectively [20].…”
Section: Aki Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations