“…Groups of interest for marine spatial planning could include for example specific community-level functional groups (e.g., apex predators, Block et al, 2011), taxonomic groups (e.g., seabirds, Ronconi et al, 2012), species-at-risk (e.g., African penguins Spheniscus demersus, Ludynia et al, 2012), sub-populations (e.g., seabird colonies, Louzao et al, 2011; sea turtle breeding areas, Schofield et al, 2013) or specific life history phases, often divided further by sex (e.g., pupping female white sharks Carcharodon carcharias, Domeier and Nasby-Lucas, 2013). Our ability to study the space use of marine animals belonging to a specific group of-concern continues to expand with innovations in animal-attached biologging devices that record location and other ancillary data (Cooke, 2008;Hussey et al, 2015;Wilson et al, 2015). Importantly, how we use these individual-based data to define space use more broadly for the higher-level group to which the tracked animals belong, influences how we interpret the biological and management implications of the findings.…”