2015
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of biological sensor tags in animal conservation

Abstract: Electronic tags (both biotelemetry and biologging platforms) have informed conservation and resource management policy and practice by providing vital information on the spatial ecology of animals and their environments. However, the extent of the contribution of biological sensors (within electronic tags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In future work, our technique might provide additional information that can be used in conjunction with the vector of the dynamic body acceleration (VeDBA), magnetometer measurements and GPS data to achieve this goal. It is clear that biological sensor tags can play a critical role in animal conservation [42]. We hope that further research in the presented and related directions can serve to optimise system longevity and data resolution, thereby enabling advances in applied ecological monitoring and wildlife conservation by means of sensor-equipped tags and real-time on-board processing techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future work, our technique might provide additional information that can be used in conjunction with the vector of the dynamic body acceleration (VeDBA), magnetometer measurements and GPS data to achieve this goal. It is clear that biological sensor tags can play a critical role in animal conservation [42]. We hope that further research in the presented and related directions can serve to optimise system longevity and data resolution, thereby enabling advances in applied ecological monitoring and wildlife conservation by means of sensor-equipped tags and real-time on-board processing techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general premise is that such tags allow free-living animals to be studied with Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10344-016-1051-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. only minor disturbance Ropert-Coudert and Wilson 2005) and minimal observer effects (Cagnacci et al 2010) while delivering insights into animal behaviour and ecology (Shillinger et al 2012;Weimerskirch 2007) with potential implications for conservation and management actions (Schofield et al 2007;Wilson et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups of interest for marine spatial planning could include for example specific community-level functional groups (e.g., apex predators, Block et al, 2011), taxonomic groups (e.g., seabirds, Ronconi et al, 2012), species-at-risk (e.g., African penguins Spheniscus demersus, Ludynia et al, 2012), sub-populations (e.g., seabird colonies, Louzao et al, 2011; sea turtle breeding areas, Schofield et al, 2013) or specific life history phases, often divided further by sex (e.g., pupping female white sharks Carcharodon carcharias, Domeier and Nasby-Lucas, 2013). Our ability to study the space use of marine animals belonging to a specific group of-concern continues to expand with innovations in animal-attached biologging devices that record location and other ancillary data (Cooke, 2008;Hussey et al, 2015;Wilson et al, 2015). Importantly, how we use these individual-based data to define space use more broadly for the higher-level group to which the tracked animals belong, influences how we interpret the biological and management implications of the findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%